ERRORS THREAD Report Errors and Omissions Here

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

 projeKct wrote:

 nick_h_nz wrote:

I could have felt that you suggesting I read from the beginning was patronising and/or condescending. I didn’t, because you have made it obvious that you are someone who likes to safe than sorry, and would rather (re)emphasise something already said, than assume someone has actually read it. But that was the problem when you said “not sure” after Cristi checked he had done nothing wrong, and then repeated what you had already said. Again, that wasn’t wrong, and I wouldn’t have taken offence at it. I don’t even think Cristi would have normally, either. But it could be taken that way.

Well, now I feel sorry about the "re-read" suggestion.  Can I backtrack on it?

But I also want to thank you for taking all this time to explain your point of view. I take notes. I will try my best to not upset anyone unintentionally in future posts.

Peace!

Don’t worry about it. I probably offend more people more often than you do. I don’t mean to do it, and I know the way I write can be quite blunt and tactless. It’s not deliberate, and I do try and think about how what I say might be taken, but I still manage to cock it up more often than not.
As I’ve said, I have never had any problem personally with what you’ve said, so please don’t feel sorry about the “re-read”. We’re all good, and as Cristi said, I reckon we can all move on.