Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Propaganda
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Propaganda

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 8>
Author
Message
 Rating: Topic Rating: 2 Votes, Average 1.00  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
omphaloskepsis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2011
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 5995
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote omphaloskepsis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 22 2023 at 09:24
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

^ I would say that the big narratives are mostly about ideologies. All of them include facts, fake facts, correct assumptions and wrong assumptions, which makes it really hard to figure them out. Congratulations if you managed to do it, in which case I would wonder how you can be certain of it. I have put a lot of effort in the attempt, and I would say that I know a lot more about many of them than the typical person does, yet I am in no way certain that I have figured them out. 


How can you be certain?  You can't be 100% certain. However, you can manage a certainty level above 90% in many instances. Dive deep into a logic/critical thinking/statistics/ scientific method education.  Dry test your skills against hundreds of examples of empirical data.  Observe where your skills falter.  Adapt/Adjust.
 
Make sure your critical thinking skills consistently agree with empirical data. For example: I'm a biologist and RN. Biologists know that bacterial and viral diseases tend to mutate into LESS virulent forms. In 2020/2021, the media scared people into thinking COVID-19 would mutate into something even worse. Immediately I remembered mounds of bacterial/viral mutation empirical data. I thought, " Are decades worth of disease mutation data false, or is the media lying?"  


  Constantly double-check your critical thinking skills.  Does your logic alert you to lies, faulty data, and inconsistent logic? Put alternative explanations through your critical thinking grinder.  Discard faulty explanations/hypotheses.  Often, more than one explanation passes through your critical thinking shredder, relatively unscathed.  Ask yourself, " Can both explanations be simultaneously true?"  Sure...happens all the time.  On the other hand, if the explanations are contradictory, you'll need more data to decipher the truth.  


As you refine your critical thinking skills, you will easily spot patterns that confused you in your younger daze.  Also, you'll realize instances when you do not have enough information to decode the propaganda.  You'll think, " I'm missing something."  Wait for it.  Usually, an obvious solution will reveal itself.  You just need to wait for a few more cards to be played.

 If you studied the scientific method and stats, you can make predictions and apply statistical tests to measure the correlations.  Empirical data suggests a correlation.  Cause and effect are more difficult to prove, but you can at least rise above the noise and confusion and carry on like a wayward son. Wink

 Don't be afraid to be wrong.  It's OK to be wrong...just don't stay wrong.  Treasure times when you're wrong.  These are the most valuable.  Why? Because you just improved your critical thinking skills by discarding faulty data for more reliable data.  



Edited by omphaloskepsis - October 22 2023 at 09:35
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 13530
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 23 2023 at 07:05
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

^ I would say that the big narratives are mostly about ideologies. All of them include facts, fake facts, correct assumptions and wrong assumptions, which makes it really hard to figure them out. Congratulations if you managed to do it, in which case I would wonder how you can be certain of it. I have put a lot of effort in the attempt, and I would say that I know a lot more about many of them than the typical person does, yet I am in no way certain that I have figured them out. 

Ideologies are first and foremost a matter of values. So it's much about to clarify with oneself which values one consider to be the most important, and then try to support those ideologies which best correspond to those values. And as Cindy says, it's OK to be wrong...or it's better to be wrong than not to take any stance at all.


Edited by David_D - October 23 2023 at 08:50
                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 20655
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote MikeEnRegalia Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 23 2023 at 08:10
^ sure, there is a connection between ideologies and values. But when it comes to propaganda, it's more about truth. Propaganda is just a euphemism for lies and bullsh*t, often for the purpose of advancing an ideology or ulterior motive (profit).

So the question is: Can propaganda be used to advance an ideology, if it represents values you approve of? Or put more simply: Do the ends justify the means?
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 13530
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 23 2023 at 08:34
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

^ sure, there is a connection between ideologies and values. But when it comes to propaganda, it's more about truth. Propaganda is just a euphemism for lies and bullsh*t, often for the purpose of advancing an ideology or ulterior motive (profit).

So the question is: Can propaganda be used to advance an ideology, if it represents values you approve of? Or put more simply: Do the ends justify the means?

Your first post, beginning with "It is almost impossible to KNOW you're right about any of the big narratives of our time. ", was about the big narratives in general, and it's only that I've responded to. Wink

                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
suitkees View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 19 2020
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 8844
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote suitkees Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 24 2023 at 08:23
For those of you who don't trust the "mainstream media", I have two questions:
1. What is/who are the "mainstream media" according to you?
2. What are your (more or less) trusted information sources?
 

The razamataz is a pain in the bum
Back to Top
JD View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 07 2009
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 18392
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote JD Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 24 2023 at 09:54
Originally posted by suitkees suitkees wrote:

For those of you who don't trust the "mainstream media", I have two questions:
1. What is/who are the "mainstream media" according to you?
2. What are your (more or less) trusted information sources?
 
1 - Breitbart News Network, One America News Network (OAN), FOX News (It's truly what they've become sadly)
2 - My puppy's plush love toy, Moose. It's never lied to me once.
Thank you for supporting independently produced music
Back to Top
omphaloskepsis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2011
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 5995
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote omphaloskepsis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 24 2023 at 11:39
Originally posted by suitkees suitkees wrote:

For those of you who don't trust the "mainstream media", I have two questions:
1. What is/who are the "mainstream media" according to you?
2. What are your (more or less) trusted information sources?
 

1. If it's on TV, I do not trust it.  If a pattern emerges, such that an online publication like Huffpost parrots either CNN, CNBC, or FOX...I discard it as a source. I do not trust Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not allowed by Universities or any serious publication as a source.   If you use Wikipedia on a college paper...you'll receive an F.  I don't trust any media organization owned by Google, Yahoo, or partially owned by BlackRock and Vanguard. 

Together, BlackRock and Vanguard own:

 

• Eighteen percent of Fox.

• Sixteen percent of CBS, and therefore also of Sixty Minutes.

• Thirteen percent of Comcast, which owns NBC, MSNBC, CNBC, and the Sky media group.

• Twelve percent of CNN.

• Twelve percent of Disney, which owns ABC and FiveThirtyEight.

• Between ten and fourteen percent of Gannett, which owns more than 250 Gannett daily newspapers plus USA Today.

• Ten percent of the Sinclair local television news, which controls seventy-two percent of U.S. households’ local TV.

• A large unspecified chunk of Graham Media Group, which owns Slate and Foreign Policy.


Wink



Edited by omphaloskepsis - October 25 2023 at 07:30
Back to Top
CosmicVibration View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 26 2014
Location: Milky Way
Status: Offline
Points: 1331
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (2) Thanks(2)   Quote CosmicVibration Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 24 2023 at 11:46

Some mainstream media outlets, but there are many more.

CNN

ABC

MSNBC

Fox News

Huffpost

The Atlantic

Guardian

 

Ironically, I viewed Fox News as the worst in BS output until about 3 years ago and things seemed to have flipped.

I still scan my iphone for news articles, which mostly consist of the list above plus others such as Bloomburg, The Hill, Washington Post, etc.

 

Rumble can be a good source with folks like Matt Taibbi and others that I can’t remember the names offhand.  There are podcasts like Dark Horse and Joe Rogan that have interesting guests.

Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 19705
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sean Trane Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 24 2023 at 13:16
Originally posted by suitkees suitkees wrote:

For those of you who don't trust the "mainstream media", I have two questions:
1. What is/who are the "mainstream media" according to you?
2. What are your (more or less) trusted information sources?
 


If it's not printed on paper and kept in archives, I generally don't trust it. I can maybe trust some TV channels, but not internet sites, who most likely don't keep archives. If I hear something on radio, I will have to "read" it somewhere else for me to start believing it.

1. In times of heavy war tensions, journalism tends to sleep in the extablishment's bed >> see the Cold War propaganda that all western mainstream medias relayed for decades from the 40's to the end of the 80's. It somewhat disappeared from 90 until 05.

2. I tend to trust like you, Le Monde Diplomatique (but not really the daily Le Monde), but also Le Canard Enchainé (even if I almost never read it, because too Franco-centric) and Charlie Hebdo.


Edited by Sean Trane - October 24 2023 at 13:21
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
Lewian View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 09 2015
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14186
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (2) Thanks(2)   Quote Lewian Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 25 2023 at 03:31
A good guideline is to look for people who have a proven ability to criticise themselves and admit mistakes. Proper propaganda doesn't come with self-doubt.
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 13530
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 25 2023 at 06:28
Originally posted by David_D David_D wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

^ sure, there is a connection between ideologies and values. But when it comes to propaganda, it's more about truth. Propaganda is just a euphemism for lies and bullsh*t, often for the purpose of advancing an ideology or ulterior motive (profit).

So the question is: Can propaganda be used to advance an ideology, if it represents values you approve of? Or put more simply: Do the ends justify the means?

Your first post, beginning with "It is almost impossible to KNOW you're right about any of the big narratives of our time. ", was about the big narratives in general, and it's only that I've responded to. Wink

But I'd like to point that the term "propaganda" has been used very differently and in much more complicated ways than you tell us in this post of yours.

                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 20655
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote MikeEnRegalia Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 25 2023 at 06:37
^ Propaganda is simply information spread with the intention of influencing people, with the implication being that it's false or bullsh*t. I think that the usage of the word in this thread has been largely compatible with this definition. If you do not, by all means elaborate.
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 13530
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 25 2023 at 07:07
Originally posted by David_D David_D wrote:

But I'd like to point that the term "propaganda" has been used very differently and in much more complicated ways than you tell us in this post of yours.

I better correct it to:

But I'd like to point that the term "propaganda" has been used in various and much more complicated ways than you tell us in this post of yours.

                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 13530
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 25 2023 at 07:10
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

^ Propaganda is simply information spread with the intention of influencing people, with the implication being that it's false or bullsh*t. I think that the usage of the word in this thread has been largely compatible with this definition. If you do not, by all means elaborate.

What I mean can be read in this article by Wikipedia:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda  .


Edited by David_D - October 25 2023 at 07:15
                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
omphaloskepsis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2011
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 5995
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote omphaloskepsis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 25 2023 at 07:33
Originally posted by David_D David_D wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

^ Propaganda is simply information spread with the intention of influencing people, with the implication being that it's false or bullsh*t. I think that the usage of the word in this thread has been largely compatible with this definition. If you do not, by all means elaborate.

What I mean can be read in this article by Wikipedia:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda  .

Wikipedia is a major source of propaganda.  If you use Wikipedia as a source on a college paper, you'll receive an F.  Wink
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 20655
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote MikeEnRegalia Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 25 2023 at 07:33
^ Not going to read ten pages of definitions just because you aren't able to make a concise point.
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 13530
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 25 2023 at 08:01
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

^ Not going to read ten pages of definitions just because you aren't able to make a concise point.

Not necessary either, you've already got the main point. The rest of it, just if you're curious. Big smile
                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
I prophesy disaster View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 31 2017
Location: Australia
Status: Online
Points: 4606
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote I prophesy disaster Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 25 2023 at 08:05
Originally posted by omphaloskepsis omphaloskepsis wrote:

I do not trust Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not allowed by Universities or any serious publication as a source.   If you use Wikipedia on a college paper...you'll receive an F.
 
People criticise Wikipedia, but there was a study performed by Nature in which Wikipedia was compared with Encyclopedia Brittanica. In this study, it was found that Wikipedia had on average about four inaccuracies per article compared to about three for Encyclopedia Brittanica. That's not a big difference considering their reputations.
 

No, I know how to behave in the restaurant now, I don't tear at the meat with my hands. If I've become a man of the world somehow, that's not necessarily to say I'm a worldly man.
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 13530
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 25 2023 at 08:14
Originally posted by omphaloskepsis omphaloskepsis wrote:

Originally posted by David_D David_D wrote:

What I mean can be read in this article by Wikipedia:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda  .
Wikipedia is a major source of propaganda.  If you use Wikipedia as a source on a college paper, you'll receive an F.  Wink

Colleges and universities have their own propaganda. Wink

                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 20655
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MikeEnRegalia Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 25 2023 at 08:18
Originally posted by David_D David_D wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

^ Not going to read ten pages of definitions just because you aren't able to make a concise point.

Not necessary either, you've already got the main point. The rest of it, just if you're curious. Big smile

If your point is simply that there are unnecessarily complex definitions of the word propaganda being used on the interwebs, I don't disagree Smile
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 8>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.145 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.