Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Russia/Ukraine tensions - Any concern?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedRussia/Ukraine tensions - Any concern?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 678910 38>
Author
Message
omphaloskepsis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2011
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 6001
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 18 2021 at 15:43
Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

Instead of you telling lies about the Polish people, lets let the Polish people speak for themselves:

American Democracy torchers prisoners. 
 





Edited by omphaloskepsis - December 18 2021 at 15:47
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10395
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 18 2021 at 15:50
If anyone thinks I'm going to defend the US and US foreign policy, you don't know me well. My avatar is from an album called "America Eats its Young". Its a scathing satire on US greed, violence, materialism, colonialism and racism from an African American perspective.

I am only here to represent my friends from Eastern Europe, particularly those that had to deal with soviets on a day to day basis.

Anyway, I thought Cindy was the big MAGA US nationalist. I hate that stuff.
I am anti-racist, anti-fascist and anti-imperialist. Hopefully hollywood donald is headed to jail

Edited by Easy Money - December 18 2021 at 16:23
Back to Top
Woon Deadn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 30 2010
Location: P
Status: Offline
Points: 1007
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 18 2021 at 15:55
Originally posted by Mirakaze Mirakaze wrote:

Originally posted by Woon Deadn Woon Deadn wrote:

the USSR did not hate Poland, did not want to kill its population
Originally posted by Woon Deadn Woon Deadn wrote:

Nobody banned Polish language or Polish culture.

Stalin hated independent Poland. He had his reasons that seemed adequate to him. Bolsheviks lost the war against the Capitalist Poland twenty years earlier. He certainly didn't like the independent Capitalist Polish state.
Of course, the Soviets acted in the recently-occupied Poland that way they acted in the USSR at the time. I meant the post-WW2 and especially the post-Stalin Poland. And again, nobody banned Polish language or Polish culture. There were people of culture that might be "banned". 

Originally posted by Mirakaze Mirakaze wrote:

Originally posted by Woon Deadn Woon Deadn wrote:

Nobody in the USSR was planning to settle Russians in Poland

The Wikipedia article mentions transfers from Ukraine, since these territories largely populated by ethnic Ukrainians were added to the Soviet Ukraine in 1939. Naturally, if these territories are Soviet Ukrainian, Poles were moved away to Poland and some Ukrainians from the rest of Ukraine were moved to this now new western Ukrainian territories. Nobody was going to settle Russians in Poland, nobody did it. Anyway, the settled Ukrainians were not going to keep Poles by them as the slaves - nobody in the USSR had that nazi mentality 

Originally posted by Mirakaze Mirakaze wrote:

Originally posted by Woon Deadn Woon Deadn wrote:

The USSR needed a living shield and a worldwide prestige.
Originally posted by Woon Deadn Woon Deadn wrote:

Three Baltic countries were needed by the USSR because at the time a lot of European countries had pro-nazi, pro-fascist views/power. The USSR understood that the pro-nazi governments right near Leningrad would be too dangerous for national security. National security is a magical word combination that makes miracles come true...


I'm sure Germany in 1940 felt concerned by the possibility of the Low Countries allowing Allied forces on its territory, and having pro-British democracies right near the Ruhr area was certainly a threat to national security. Does that mean they were justified in occupying my country?

Nazism was definitely not a branch of Communism. By methods used - yes, by nature - not. Communism in theory was a very progressive concept, it was directed at building brand-new people, brand-new society (Aleister Crowley, anyone?). Nazism heavily relied upon half-mythical half-heathen past, it did not build the shining future, it rebuilt the hardly identifiable past. Nazism was Socialist only in name. Many if not all Capitalist countries of the time liked or at least sympathised with Nazism. Given that, up until September 1939 why should the Germans feel concerned about your Capitalist country or other Capitalist countries? The Nazi Germany was Totalitarian Capitalist. 

In 1940 the Nazis indeed were justified in occupying your country. What do you expect of them? Or what do you wish to mean by "justified"? They were wrong from the very beginning of the war - according to their worldview, they were obviously justified. It was their criminal logics. Pragmatic cynical logics.

Originally posted by Mirakaze Mirakaze wrote:

Originally posted by Woon Deadn Woon Deadn wrote:

The situation with Crimea is very different. It was "gifted" (illegally even by vague Soviet law, because at the time of voting there were no enough voters in the government in Moscow) to Ukraine by Nikita Khrushchev. This region traditionally considered itself... non-Ukrainian. There were Crimean Tatars that naturally leant towards Turkey and other Turkic lands outside - Kiev and Crimean Tatars mutually... not quite liked each otherBig smile. There was also a big Russian minority - that is, majority

Again, the comparison with Nazi Germany's annexation of the Sudetenland applies here. What sort of precedent do you think it would set if countries were allowed to just unilaterally take territory by force when they feel that it belongs to them?

The comparison with Nazi Germany is crystally obvious! I agree. But, speaking of the Crimea, you probably have a somewhat distorted picture of the preceding events in Ukraine... I suppose, for you Euromaidan was when like 80% of Ukraine's population protested against the corrupted bloody maniac Viktor Yanukovych, he ordered to shoot the armless peaceful people, but they defeated him and his cronies and then Russia stole the Crimea by force, keeping its inhabitants under their guns. 

I'm telling you as the man from Ukraine that like 40% of Ukrainians supported Euromaidan protests - like 40% of Ukrainians did not support it. Up to this day nobody knows who really shot the protesters, nobody also knows who shot the policemen... There were claims that both the protesters and the policemen were shot with the same types of bullets... Nobody denied these claims... Viktor Yanukovych despite his truly redneckish appearance and physique was a cowardly person, it was very obvious in the time of Euromaidan. He was not able to order shootings of the protesters, because he was terribly scared by the promised western sanctions. 

So, look at it this way. After Euromaidan, end of February, beginning of March 2014 there is no law in the country. Police is totally absent in the streets. Ordinary people, usually adult strong men gather in vigilante groups to somehow prevent casual crimes, at least petty ones. The whole country lives on the brink of collapse. Crowds of youngsters (not always, but usually of neo-nazi views) control the city councils: literally, they just live there, sleep there, eat at the council's canteens - for free, of course. Later on, the police would go to work but at the first weeks or so, each police squad of two patrolling policemen would be accompanied by a young protester (again, not always, but usually with a neo-nazi or close to neo-nazi views). There was a Ukrainian national souvenir shop in my native city where for like a few months during and after Euromaidan they sold among other things (that is, plates, skirts, shirts, emblems)... a baseball bat. I mean, I know nobody who plays or even knows the rules of baseball in the whole Ukraine. But the protesters indeed needed a place where they could easily buy (or take?) a hard wooden stick for their peacefulLOL deeds...

Now tell me please, how should the people in the Crimea, the region that overwhelmingly did NOT support Euromaidan, look at the chaos in the country?

Was there a coup d'etat in Sudetenland? Was there such a chaos when Germany annexed it? Was there a Communist uprising in Sudetenland? So, there's no comparison, if you dive deep. On the surface, yes - it's the same thing.

Originally posted by Mirakaze Mirakaze wrote:

Originally posted by omphaloskepsis omphaloskepsis wrote:

I can somewhat fathom how Russia feels about NATO/American weapons on their border. Moscow is 300 miles from the Ukraine border... American/NATO ships on war-exorcises in the Black Sea.  How would America feel if China and Russia ran joint war-exercises in The Gulf of Mexico?  Too close for comfort.
No one in their right mind honestly believes that a NATO invasion of Russia is in any way a plausible scenario. It's the threat from Russia that these countries are afraid of and because of which they continue to seek military aid from NATO and the USA, which they are in their complete right to do as sovereign nations.

Still, the question of national security blinds and deafens. If the vast country, vast by area and population, not necessarily an economical giant, feels like threatened - nothing can help. 

I think, you'd agree that Cuba and the USSR were two independent countries. They have a right to deploy, construct, build, destroy, whatever they wanted on the territories of their countries. However, Cuba was critically close to the USA. The USA didn't like the idea of Soviet missiles in Cuba. Because they felt like that. 

Russia doesn't like this idea. They feel like that. 


Edited by Woon Deadn - December 18 2021 at 16:22
Favourite Band: Gentle Giant
Favourite Writer: Robert Sheckley
Favourite Horror Writer: Jean Ray
Favourite Computer Game: Tiny Toon - Buster's Hidden Treasure (Sega Mega Drive/Genesis)
Back to Top
omphaloskepsis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2011
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 6001
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 18 2021 at 16:18
Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

If anyone thinks I'm going to defend the US and US foreign policy, you don't know me well. My avatar is from an album called "America Eats its Young". Its a scathing satire on US greed, violence, materialism, colonialism and racism from an African American perspective.

I am only here to defend my friends from Eastern Europe

Anyway, I thought Cindy was the big MAGA US nationalist. I hate that stuff.


I was pointing out that neither Russia, America, NATO, Poland, or Ukraine have the high moral ground. Every country's government seethes with corruption.   



For the hundredth time. I did not vote for Trump.  Why do you keep telling me who I support for President?

  I believe with all my heart, that every county has a right to argue and defend their country.  I do not think that Woon is saying that Eastern European countries should join or give up their national sovereignty to Russia.  ( Correct me Woon, If I read you wrong.)

I think Woon is like the color commentator at a televised sporting event.  Woon's descriptions ooze with nuance, country traditions, historical zeitgeist, and regional feelings. Woon adds color, metaphor,  and poetic  storytelling to the conversation...the opposite of black and white.  When Woon claims something about the people of Ukraine or Russia, he is NOT saying, " Everybody feels this way in Ukraine and Russia."  Woon is doing his best to discuss his viewpoint, understanding, and history of his country, family, and fellow Ukrainians and Russians, as he sees it.  


Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10395
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 18 2021 at 18:16
Colorful possibly, unfortunately a lot of the things he says are incorrect, and if either of you knew personally the people I know who grew up under soviet domination, you would know how disrespectful some of these things can sound.

I do not care for US foreign policy or US propaganda, for that reason I visited soviet East Europe in the early 80s to see how much of it was true for myself. Yes, the US propaganda machine exaggerated things, but nothing I saw was in conflict with the stories I heard from others from Eastern Europe throughout the rest of my life.
Back to Top
siLLy puPPy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic

Joined: October 05 2013
Location: SFcaUsA
Status: Offline
Points: 14797
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 18 2021 at 18:32
Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

Colorful possibly, unfortunately a lot of the things he says are incorrect, and if either of you knew personally the people I know who grew up under soviet domination, you would know how disrespectful some of these things can sound.

I do not care for US foreign policy or US propaganda, for that reason I visited soviet East Europe in the early 80s to see how much of it was true for myself. Yes, the US propaganda machine exaggerated things, but nothing I saw was in conflict with the stories I heard from others from Eastern Europe throughout the rest of my life.


I think what they're trying to say is that not all people from any given country are the same. Of course some hated the occupation of the USSR but others welcomed it because they benefited from it. Poland may have been the victim of both German and Soviet occupation but some Poles readily turned in Jews to the Nazis. The human population varies everywhere and just because you know a few select individuals who have points of view due to how they were affected doesn't mean everyone else in the nation agrees.

I have been to Poland several times and had more than my share of conversations with highly educated historians about these matters. You are missing the bigger picture which our Ukrainian friend is presenting.

It basically boils down to those who want to rule us through tyranny and those who want freedom. These human behaviors transcend all cultural boundaries however those are defined. Obviously it's the average humans who suffer from those who want to make them pawns on their chessboards but to pretend that certain segments of the population didn't sell out to cash in on siding with the enemy is rather naive.



https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy
Back to Top
Woon Deadn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 30 2010
Location: P
Status: Offline
Points: 1007
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 19 2021 at 03:41
Originally posted by siLLy puPPy siLLy puPPy wrote:

Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

Colorful possibly, unfortunately a lot of the things he says are incorrect, and if either of you knew personally the people I know who grew up under soviet domination, you would know how disrespectful some of these things can sound.

I do not care for US foreign policy or US propaganda, for that reason I visited soviet East Europe in the early 80s to see how much of it was true for myself. Yes, the US propaganda machine exaggerated things, but nothing I saw was in conflict with the stories I heard from others from Eastern Europe throughout the rest of my life.


I think what they're trying to say is that not all people from any given country are the same. Of course some hated the occupation of the USSR but others welcomed it because they benefited from it. Poland may have been the victim of both German and Soviet occupation but some Poles readily turned in Jews to the Nazis. The human population varies everywhere and just because you know a few select individuals who have points of view due to how they were affected doesn't mean everyone else in the nation agrees.

I have been to Poland several times and had more than my share of conversations with highly educated historians about these matters. You are missing the bigger picture which our Ukrainian friend is presenting.

It basically boils down to those who want to rule us through tyranny and those who want freedom. These human behaviors transcend all cultural boundaries however those are defined. Obviously it's the average humans who suffer from those who want to make them pawns on their chessboards but to pretend that certain segments of the population didn't sell out to cash in on siding with the enemy is rather naive.



There are several cornerstones that many people outside of the former USSR/Russia seem to misunderstand or misinterpret. 

First, certainly the factor of fear. The guy from Ushanka Show channel on YT, not a big fan of the USSR or Putin, pointed it out with remarkable accuracy! The most popular, most massive Soviet profession was an engineer of some sort. Engineers constituted the middle stratum of the Soviet middle class, so to say. Engineers, like my late father or my mother, never consciously met with the KGB in their whole lives! In the last three years of the USSR's existence the KGB in return transformed into a useful whipping boy for almost every conscious Soviet citizen. But even earlier, even since early 1970s even among the intelligentsia if you didn't just say the country is wrong but pointed at clearly articulated minuses of the Soviet reality, you felt no fear. 
Biting, sarcastic, caustic movies like Eldar Ryazanov's "Garage" released in 1979 were allowed by the Soviet censorhip, and it was pre-1980s! Though the movie easily busted the Soviet reality and was prominently anti-Soviet: 



When the foreign media spell "Putin is KGB", for the former Soviet citizens it does not resonate that much as the foreign media and average foreign watchers think it should. It's a scarecrow for the westerners, not for the former Soviet citizens en masse. Some former Soviet citizens may feel disgust, listening to the phrase of "Putin is KGB", but not fear. 


Second, totally misunderstood and misinterpreted question of Euromaidan. For the western viewer it was the whole 45 mln people Ukraine that stood out against the pro-Russian bloody maniac (except for a few thousands of cronies and commies, of course!). For the western viewer it was clear who was to blame for all the violence - because Viktor Yanukovych befriends Putin and Putin, as we all know, is KGB... 
Euromaidan was slowly fading away, blowing off - when suddenly the first victim was mysteriously shot. It was an Armenian who recited the poem by the emblematic Ukrainian poet Taras Shevchenko on video. The guy had a touching face, very suitable for becoming the first sacred victim... Not long after he was recorded on video, he would be shot. Hundreds of people were around, everybody had a camera - there is a recording of him, touchingly reciting the poem, there is no recording of him being shot... Notice that the police was far from the place where he was killed, the protesters were near. Where's the recording then? Of course, it was and still is said he was killed by the police or secret services, Yanukovych ordered it. Why? Because Yanukovych was pro-Russian, a friend of Putin and Putin is KGB... Also because, you know, Yanukovych was a very corrupted politician, and after all, have you seen his face expressions? A typical murderer... "That one looks Jewish! And that one's a coon!", that is. As if every poorly-educated ill-mannered thief (which Yanukovych really was) is automatically a murderer, and the man's face shows what he is. Stephen Hawking, have you heard it? 

Third, the overall cultural context, the overall atmosphere. North Korea copied the theory and practices, having no historical prerequisites, having a very different history, very little resources - both human and material. Russia had the history of percepting holiness in suffering, of collectivism, of certain patriotic sentiments. Neither Asia with its cruelty nor Anglo-Saxon (or broader, Germanic and Romance) world with its individualism and hedonism can imitate such projects as the USSR. 

Fourth, myths, abundance of myths, cornucopia of myths. Every Ukrainian child learns it at school at least since the 1990s that once there was held a language beauty contest in the 1920s or 1930s in Paris or somewhere in France or so, where Italian language was considered the most beautiful of all, Ukrainian was 2nd, French (in other sources - Persian Embarrassed) came third. The only problem here that all the sources telling it are Ukrainian... You can't find any info on such a contest on the Net in English on the non-Ukrainian or non-pro-Ukrainian sites. Ukrainian is a poetic, melodic language - does it need that most likely a myth? Similarly, the number of victims of famine in Ukraine in 1932-1933 is given as 8 mln or 10 mln. It ought to be more than the victims of Holocaust... The most balanced number is 3.5 mln people, but it doesn't look convincing, for sure. Because, sure, the Ukrainian Holodomor-"Holocaust" was the holocaustest holocaust of all holocausts that ever existed (compare it with the Soviet slogan "Lenin is more alive than all the living ones" Shocked). The fact is that the very term Holodomor was first used in the Canadian press in the late 1970s right a few years before Moscow Summer Olympic Games (mystreriously, Euromaidan happened before and during and after Sochi Winter Olympic Games)...

Fifth, semi-myths, demi-myths. Antisemitism in the USSR, for example. There was a very nice Soviet movie version of Three Men In A Boat, a musical comedy featuring three ladies and other additional stuff. The actor that played J had a Jewish father, those who played Harris and Mrs Poppits were Jews. The director was a Jew. The composer was a Jew... Antisemitism per definition implies in the West a Nazi-style attitude. The Soviet antisemitism like most other Soviet things was of very odd and ambiguous nature... 



Edited by Woon Deadn - December 19 2021 at 06:43
Favourite Band: Gentle Giant
Favourite Writer: Robert Sheckley
Favourite Horror Writer: Jean Ray
Favourite Computer Game: Tiny Toon - Buster's Hidden Treasure (Sega Mega Drive/Genesis)
Back to Top
Woon Deadn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 30 2010
Location: P
Status: Offline
Points: 1007
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 19 2021 at 04:23
Originally posted by Easy Money Easy Money wrote:

Colorful possibly, unfortunately a lot of the things he says are incorrect, and if either of you knew personally the people I know who grew up under soviet domination, you would know how disrespectful some of these things can sound.

I do not care for US foreign policy or US propaganda, for that reason I visited soviet East Europe in the early 80s to see how much of it was true for myself. Yes, the US propaganda machine exaggerated things, but nothing I saw was in conflict with the stories I heard from others from Eastern Europe throughout the rest of my life.
 

Sir, I have no doubt that for the foreign countries controlled by the USSR and probably for three Soviet Baltic republics everything was grey, pessimistic and right what you've said about. I have already told you I personally feel uncomfortable knowing that the country I was born in, committed such crimes. However, first, we must see the difference between the Nazi view of Slavs as subhumans and the Soviet (even Stalin era's) view of Slavs as the geopolitical instrument. Second, we must see the difference between the different epochs of Soviet existence. It's not a secret that for an average citizen of the USSR Poland looked like true classic Europe. There was a more-than-decade-long Soviet TV comedy variety show called Cabaret "13 chairs" where all the characters had Polish names. In the eyes of the Soviet intelligentsia Poles were rather seen as superhumans, not subhumans.  

And, by the way, I also have Polish friends - to be correct, relatives of my granma. The old couple Viktor and Bronislawa, both already died. He worked as a taxi driver, she was a school teacher of Russian language. One of their daughters Lilia worked as a dentist, another one Julia moved to the USA, worked there as a nanny in the 1980s, met there an Australian-born man Tadeusz of Polish descent. They married and were a couple of multimillionaires. After the 2001 events they decided to go to Poland. Now they live in Poland. Their attitude to the USSR is moderate, rather neutral. As well as the attitude of her parents, for all I know.

So, to each his own truth. 


Edited by Woon Deadn - December 19 2021 at 04:26
Favourite Band: Gentle Giant
Favourite Writer: Robert Sheckley
Favourite Horror Writer: Jean Ray
Favourite Computer Game: Tiny Toon - Buster's Hidden Treasure (Sega Mega Drive/Genesis)
Back to Top
Woon Deadn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 30 2010
Location: P
Status: Offline
Points: 1007
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 19 2021 at 05:05
Re Mirakaze 
---

I understood from your words that you know the facts perfectly, but have little idea of the background. 

In particular, Poland has become an independent country in the 20th century after the WW1. For centuries it was a part of other empires. Its population was thus treated as an insignificant ethnic minority in those empires... After they gained independence what did the Poles do to the ethnic minorities such as Ukrainians or Belarusians inside their newly-born Polish country? They did exactly the same that was done to them, if not worse! They were bullied by their owners, now they started bullying Ukrainian and Belarusian ethnic minorities. The Polish regions that were occupied by the Soviet army in 1939 were exactly those regions where the overwhelming majority of rural population consisted of Ukrainians and Belarusians. There were a few cities where the Poles constituted a majority, but all in all the region was rural, agricultural. The USSR added the respective parts of the occupied lands to Soviet Ukraine and Soviet Belarus. Also they have killed many Polish citizens, yes. Initially, the Ukrainian and Belarusian peasants in those lands joyfully greeted the Soviet power as their liberators. Soon, the Stalin's repressions came to those lands - the peasants changed their joy to grief and hatred. 

Anyway, those links that you sent me avoid the historical and sociocultural background that I give you. When Poland was liberated from the Nazis by the Soviet army in 1945, Poles were given a part of formerly German territory as the kind of compensation for the lost in 1939 territories, I suppose. Since that time, there indeed were repressions, but the USSR did not ban Polish culture, language and did not look at Poles as subhumans. Quite the opposite, Poland as well as East Germany were seen in the USSR as highly-developed countries with highly progressive populations. 


Edited by Woon Deadn - December 19 2021 at 15:50
Favourite Band: Gentle Giant
Favourite Writer: Robert Sheckley
Favourite Horror Writer: Jean Ray
Favourite Computer Game: Tiny Toon - Buster's Hidden Treasure (Sega Mega Drive/Genesis)
Back to Top
Lewian View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 09 2015
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14205
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 19 2021 at 15:18
Thanks by the way for the link to Soviet Movies Explained. Quite a treasure trove that is!
Back to Top
Woon Deadn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 30 2010
Location: P
Status: Offline
Points: 1007
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 19 2021 at 15:49
Originally posted by Lewian Lewian wrote:

Thanks by the way for the link to Soviet Movies Explained. Quite a treasure trove that is!

Absolutely! I'm glad I was helpful! Also Crazy Russian Dad and Ushanka Show have tons of videos on the topic of the USSR. 

There is also this channel dedicated to Soviet movies: 




Recently the Oscar-winning Soviet movie "Moscow does not believe in tears" was uploaded on YT with English subtitles: 


Favourite Band: Gentle Giant
Favourite Writer: Robert Sheckley
Favourite Horror Writer: Jean Ray
Favourite Computer Game: Tiny Toon - Buster's Hidden Treasure (Sega Mega Drive/Genesis)
Back to Top
Davesax1965 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 23 2013
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2826
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 21 2021 at 04:21
If anyone replying to this thread believes that the USSR / modern day Russia is somehow a bogeyman state and that their own country represents the pinnacle of social paradise, freedom and equality, with the poorest members, old and disadvantaged adequately cared for by the philanthropy of the rich.........

...... they are idiots. 

Everywhere is pretty much the same, only the lies are different. 




Edited by Davesax1965 - December 21 2021 at 04:22

Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 21 2021 at 05:22
Originally posted by Davesax1965 Davesax1965 wrote:

If anyone replying to this thread believes that the USSR / modern day Russia is somehow a bogeyman state and that their own country represents the pinnacle of social paradise, freedom and equality, with the poorest members, old and disadvantaged adequately cared for by the philanthropy of the rich.........

...... they are idiots. 

Everywhere is pretty much the same, only the lies are different. 





This.
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Jared View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 06 2005
Location: Hereford, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 17689
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 21 2021 at 06:23
Originally posted by Davesax1965 Davesax1965 wrote:

If anyone replying to this thread believes that the USSR / modern day Russia is somehow a bogeyman state and that their own country represents the pinnacle of social paradise, freedom and equality, with the poorest members, old and disadvantaged adequately cared for by the philanthropy of the rich.........

...... they are idiots. 

Everywhere is pretty much the same, only the lies are different.

Excellent post Dave... have a clappy Clap
Back to Top
siLLy puPPy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic

Joined: October 05 2013
Location: SFcaUsA
Status: Offline
Points: 14797
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 21 2021 at 08:21
Originally posted by Davesax1965 Davesax1965 wrote:

If anyone replying to this thread believes that the USSR / modern day Russia is somehow a bogeyman state and that their own country represents the pinnacle of social paradise, freedom and equality, with the poorest members, old and disadvantaged adequately cared for by the philanthropy of the rich.........

...... they are idiots. 

Everywhere is pretty much the same, only the lies are different. 




Everywhere is pretty much the same, huh? I suppose you'd be happy living in Somalia, Iraq, Honduras or Afghanistan then. Go for it dude! Love to see how long you'd last LOL

https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy
Back to Top
Davesax1965 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 23 2013
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2826
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 21 2021 at 10:05
I'm talking about the way society is structured. You're showing you didn't understand the nature of the post. 

It's not about individual social circumstances. And no, I wouldn't be "happy living in" any of those countries, that's a completely unconnected comparison. 

This is how it works. 

In any society, there are rich people, there are poor people. And there is a system. Whether it's a political system, a caste system or a system or religion or religions, it doesn't particularly matter. The system is there as a shiny front to "what it means to be British / Indian / Dutch........ Russian.... American".  This, if you like, is a shiny stage set, less shiny in other countries, but, there it is. Want to know what it is to be English ? There you go. A whole catalogue of examples in the form of historical events, supposed values, drilled into you from your schooldays by State and media. 

1066. 1485. Magna Carta. WW2. 

The truth of the matter is somewhat different. When I look at it, my great grandparents had 11 kids, so did their parents before them. They lived in abject industrial poverty in the richest nation on Earth with an "empire on which the sun never set". Lies. 

Lies which feed enmity and hatred. The French are our enemies. Have been since the 14th century. The English way of life is better than the Dutch or German way of life. They are somehow lesser people. 

When in fact, nationalities are only really bound by imaginary borders. People are much the same everywhere. You will find kindness if you look for it, you will find terrible cruelty if you look for it as well, and you will find that in all countries everywhere at every historic event. 

But there's the Big Lie, and this is what happens behind the shiny stage set. The Big Lie is perpetrated by those who are actually in charge, those who do very nicely thank you, and it's not always governments, but advisers and financiers and those who will do well. 

Those who will send entire generations off to the trenches of WW1 to die like sheep to protect their own interests. Those who will keep pensioners freezing when they're no longer "economically useful". Those who will incite national hatred against, say, the Chinese, as there's an economic twist to it from which they'll profit. 

And that is what a nation really is. 

There's something called Social Contract Theory. You behave as an individual of the State because the State confers you certain benefits - material possessions, peace, even the ability to flick a light switch and know that the power will come on. So. You have a duty to the State as the State provides you with these things. 

They give you enough to keep you happy and to keep the mob from their doors. 

If the entire wealth of a nation was equally shared out, or even shared out on a basis of worthiness, we would all be much better off. But it doesn't happen like that, and it never will. 

"For the masters make the rules / for the wise men / and the fools". 

So yes, Silly Puppy, on the basis of the above, everywhere is pretty much the same insofar as every nation on Earth throughout recorded history works on the same basis and always will. The lot you receive varies, that's all. 

To relate this to the OP, this isn't "Russia preparing to invade Ukraine", it's much more complicated than that, and, in a way, much simpler. This is "those who have power in Russia attempting to bolster their popularity and stay in power by gambling with a lot of lives and homes of.... those who, to them, do not really matter."

War is always economic in nature. Unless you suck up the lie that a country is "defending freedom". 

Society is all actually complete lies, ladies and gentlemen. From the beginning to the end. You should know this by now. 

Back to Top
Davesax1965 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 23 2013
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2826
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 21 2021 at 10:08
So I'll say it again. 

Think you're living in some form of socially just, morally right paradise, special and superior to others ? 

Have an idiot badge. 

You're just given more toys to keep you happy enough to not go on the rampage. 

Back to Top
Davesax1965 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 23 2013
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2826
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 21 2021 at 10:19
To understand Russia.

Russia is gigantic. Since early days, when the capital of Russia was actually in Kiev (now Kyiv, in Ukraine), Russia was a collection of uncontrollable fiefdoms. Local leaders could do what they wanted, the capital was a long way away and everything could be obscured, obfuscated or just ignored. Same attitude existed for centuries. 

There have been certain historical figures such as Yuri Dolgorukiy ("George the long handed") who could control various outposts of the empire. One of the most effective Tsars was Ivan IV - "Ivan the terrible". 

As an example, when it was suspected that the city of Novgorod was going to defect to Poland / Lithuania, Ivan had the city's inhabitants massacred. I seem to recall large numbers were tied to rafts and pushed into the frozen river. 

Monster, you may think, but Ivan was regarded as a strong leader who could control large swathes of Russia. 

The same thing happens with Stalin. Stalin, 400 years later, is a fairly dull "grey eminence" or nonentity of a man. He doesn't really have a personality other than that which he's learnt from Russian history, so he impersonates - amongst other people - Ivan IV. "This is how a Tsar behaves". You can count in his adoption of policies such as banishing prisoners to far flung parts of Russia and also having a large secretive police force.... that's how it's done, that's how it's always been done. The Tsars before him had similar systems in place.

Then along comes Putin and........... it's exactly the same, it will always be the same, Russia will never fundamentally change, not with even another revolution, which will never happen. 

That's what Russia is. 

Back to Top
Woon Deadn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 30 2010
Location: P
Status: Offline
Points: 1007
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 21 2021 at 13:54
Originally posted by Davesax1965 Davesax1965 wrote:

To understand Russia.

Russia is gigantic. Since early days, when the capital of Russia was actually in Kiev (now Kyiv, in Ukraine), Russia was a collection of uncontrollable fiefdoms. Local leaders could do what they wanted, the capital was a long way away and everything could be obscured, obfuscated or just ignored. Same attitude existed for centuries. 

There have been certain historical figures such as Yuri Dolgorukiy ("George the long handed") who could control various outposts of the empire. One of the most effective Tsars was Ivan IV - "Ivan the terrible". 

As an example, when it was suspected that the city of Novgorod was going to defect to Poland / Lithuania, Ivan had the city's inhabitants massacred. I seem to recall large numbers were tied to rafts and pushed into the frozen river. 

Monster, you may think, but Ivan was regarded as a strong leader who could control large swathes of Russia. 

The same thing happens with Stalin. Stalin, 400 years later, is a fairly dull "grey eminence" or nonentity of a man. He doesn't really have a personality other than that which he's learnt from Russian history, so he impersonates - amongst other people - Ivan IV. "This is how a Tsar behaves". You can count in his adoption of policies such as banishing prisoners to far flung parts of Russia and also having a large secretive police force.... that's how it's done, that's how it's always been done. The Tsars before him had similar systems in place.

Then along comes Putin and........... it's exactly the same, it will always be the same, Russia will never fundamentally change, not with even another revolution, which will never happen. 

That's what Russia is. 
 

Though, I must add, things got better a bit. Ivan IV went over the limits with his theatrical inventiveness in killing and torturing people that were not guilty of anything. Stalin definitely saw himself as another Ivan IV, though for the most part he at least pretended to punish those who were guilty of something. But Putin, I think, rather sees himself as a combination of Vladimir the Great, Alexander Nevsky, Peter the Great, Catherine the Great and some of the later ones like Nicholas I or Alexander III. Indeed, the odd yet evident triad of Vladimir the Great - Vladimir Lenin - Vladimir Putin comes to mind to everyone who knows Russian history. 

Putin would hardly like to torture or kill an occasional person who just, you know, he saw from the window of his car or something like that. Stalin imprisoned even his closest ones, the wife of Molotov was imprisoned for a long time. I don't think that Putin would like the idea to send into prison a wife of Dmitry Peskov or Sergey Lavrov or Dmitry Medvedev - just in case. Times change. Slowly, but unidirectionally. 

To me it is also clear that certainly Putin and his team are not Communists in the leastest least possible. They have some nostalgia - like many of their compatriots. But they certainly do not want to return to it. Also, I don't think they want a pain in their arses in the form of depressive, poor Central Asian countries or ever-anti-Russian Baltic countries. They probably want to incorporate most of Ukraine, whole or most of Belarus. Certainly, they do not have any plans about having Norway or Finland or Poland. 

I see very clearly that the people in this thread from the former or present day empires of some kind usually look at the question in a more relaxed way. Those who are from the smaller or simply small non-imperial countries usually feel nervous. That's pretty expectable and normal. If somebody was insulted by my former parallels of small countries being small dogs, I may say that the imperial ones may be compared to large breeds of dogs then. I personally am fond of ligers. All ligers that I watched on YT were thoroughly relaxed... Usual pet cats are much more nervous. If you are from the UK you see the picture more chillingly than if you are living in the Netherlands. That's normal.


Edited by Woon Deadn - December 21 2021 at 13:55
Favourite Band: Gentle Giant
Favourite Writer: Robert Sheckley
Favourite Horror Writer: Jean Ray
Favourite Computer Game: Tiny Toon - Buster's Hidden Treasure (Sega Mega Drive/Genesis)
Back to Top
siLLy puPPy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic

Joined: October 05 2013
Location: SFcaUsA
Status: Offline
Points: 14797
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 21 2021 at 15:04
Originally posted by Davesax1965 Davesax1965 wrote:



So yes, Silly Puppy, on the basis of the above, everywhere is pretty much the same insofar as every nation on Earth throughout recorded history works on the same basis and always will. The lot you receive varies, that's all. 


Yes yes blah blah but nations are service corporations masquerading as governments. Not everyone is a citizen or employee of such and exist outside of the jurisdictions of so-called nation states. Nation states are without exception based on Maritime Admiralty Law aka statutory law aka contractual law. Every woe that earthlings experience is primarily based on these contractual systems. It is not only possible to escape said jurisdiction but to flourish despite of it all. The beast gains its power through the implied consent of nobody challenging these jurisdictions. In short, the world is enslaved by pure ignorance as to these distinctions. Nation states are basically grand experiments by those who control behind the scenes in order to figure out how to implement a global system that enslaves us all. History may be filled with the same old, same old but that doesn't mean we collectively cannot change that which has been keeping every place the same as you call it.

https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 678910 38>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.172 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.