Music as Art |
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Author | ||
Tapfret
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: August 12 2007 Location: Bryant, Wa Status: Offline Points: 8576 |
Posted: March 09 2017 at 11:40 | |
That's me !... Ok, maybe not. Not sure who giffed this one. There are many variations if you Google apache.gif. Feel free to cut and paste the image link from mine. Here is its parent video. I can usually keep a straight face until the part where hi-hat sound is apparently coming from a floor tom. True art has know tangible connection to reality, right? *drumroll*
|
||
Replayer
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 04 2013 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 356 |
Posted: March 09 2017 at 14:16 | |
A disco cover of The Shadows' Apache featuring sexism/objectification, disrespect to American Indian culture and genuinely awful fashion sense?! Wow, that was truly horrendous. Excuse me while I pick up my jaw from the floor. I might have to revise my earlier proof of music being a proper subset of art by explicitly excluding kitsch. As Thatfabulousalien said (I felt silly typing that), "music and art are also not indicators of quality, just to get that out of the way" Edited by Replayer - March 09 2017 at 14:17 |
||
Tapfret
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: August 12 2007 Location: Bryant, Wa Status: Offline Points: 8576 |
Posted: March 09 2017 at 18:26 | |
^Being absolutely amazing at being bad is also a thing.
Also, I just learnt from you that this is a cover. Did not know that.
|
||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 64378 |
Posted: March 09 2017 at 19:24 | |
^^^ I can't get past the fact that he appears to be dry-humping his keyboard.
|
||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
||
Thatfabulousalien
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 27 2016 Location: Aussie/NZ Status: Offline Points: 1409 |
Posted: March 09 2017 at 20:27 | |
"Art as Art" that should be a thread now, lol
|
||
Classical music isn't dead, it's more alive than it's ever been. It's just not on MTV.
https://www.soundcloud.com/user-322914325 |
||
Replayer
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 04 2013 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 356 |
Posted: March 09 2017 at 21:45 | |
Tapfret
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: August 12 2007 Location: Bryant, Wa Status: Offline Points: 8576 |
Posted: March 09 2017 at 23:19 | |
No worse than what the drummer appears to be doing.
|
||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: March 09 2017 at 23:53 | |
...and just when you thought it couldn't get any worse, the Sugar Hill Gang came along and sampled the Seebach cover to make Jump On It!
Edited by Dean - March 10 2017 at 01:18 |
||
What?
|
||
Thatfabulousalien
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 27 2016 Location: Aussie/NZ Status: Offline Points: 1409 |
Posted: March 10 2017 at 00:26 | |
Sorry, I just can't accept music as art, it doesn't express anything
|
||
Classical music isn't dead, it's more alive than it's ever been. It's just not on MTV.
https://www.soundcloud.com/user-322914325 |
||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: March 10 2017 at 01:31 | |
pft! We can't even agree on what music is, let alone decide whether it is art or not.
|
||
What?
|
||
Thatfabulousalien
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 27 2016 Location: Aussie/NZ Status: Offline Points: 1409 |
Posted: March 10 2017 at 01:36 | |
Please refer to my previous comments, I think it was obvious I was trolling, lol
|
||
Classical music isn't dead, it's more alive than it's ever been. It's just not on MTV.
https://www.soundcloud.com/user-322914325 |
||
Tillerman88
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 31 2015 Location: Tomorrowland Status: Offline Points: 495 |
Posted: March 10 2017 at 02:13 | |
Music as art?....Art as music??... come on..............
Music did begin as a ritualistic form of expression, then evolved into an artistic form of expression. Nuff said. That said, I really couldn't care less whether my statement is correct or not, after all I know just one thing about art: it's NOT about correctness. Better saying , art has NOTHING to do with correctness.
Edited by Tillerman88 - March 10 2017 at 03:13 |
||
The overwhelming amount of information on a daily basis restrains people from rewinding the news record archives to refresh their memories...
|
||
zravkapt
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 12 2010 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 6446 |
Posted: March 10 2017 at 05:43 | |
These days music is just background noise in video games/movies/tv shows.
|
||
Magma America Great Make Again
|
||
Slartibartfast
Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam Joined: April 29 2006 Location: Atlantais Status: Offline Points: 29625 |
Posted: March 15 2017 at 16:53 | |
When I first got into prog rock, art rock was synonymous...
|
||
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 64378 |
Posted: March 15 2017 at 17:07 | |
^ In the US yeah, but I think in Europe, Artrock was more specific to VU, Bowie, and though some don't like the idea, Pink Floyd.
|
||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
||
BarryGlibb
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 28 2010 Location: Melbourne, Oz Status: Offline Points: 1781 |
Posted: March 16 2017 at 02:28 | |
Scott Walker (circa 1984 - present) has been put forward on a number of occasions to be included into PA but has been omitted (for want of a better word) because his music has been dubbed "Art Rock" not Prog. So therefore, some Music must be Art? Mustn't it?
|
||
Kepler62
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 09 2017 Location: Fort Erie Status: Offline Points: 501 |
Posted: March 16 2017 at 04:02 | |
Finally someone hits the nail on the head. Art is something that is done on a computer. Paintbrush? What's that?
|
||
SteveG
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 11 2014 Location: Kyiv In Spirit Status: Offline Points: 20506 |
Posted: March 16 2017 at 04:45 | |
Did you ever have a day when musical art sounds like wall papar?
|
||
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: March 16 2017 at 05:07 | |
In the UK at least, during the 60s and 70s Art Rock had an Art College connotation rather than a more high-brow Art Music one. I have read somewhere that Pete Townshend was one of the first to make the association between Pop music and Art (remembering that prior to dropping out and forming The Who he studied Graphics at Ealing Art College alongside Ronnie Wood and Freddy Mercury), essentially putting the Art into Pop (as opposed to Warhol putting the Pop into Art). Though of course Townshend was not the first Art student to form a band and The Who weren't the only band in the mid-60s to be regarded as Art Rock. Pete Brown and Piblokto!'s album 'Things May Come and Things May Go but the Art School Dance Goes on Forever' is a classic example of that Art School/College heritage. From that perspective Floyd can also be regarded as Art College drop-outs (specifically Camberwell College of Arts and Regent Street Polytechnic), though Bowie is more guilt-through-association as he never attended Art School as such (he has 'O' Level Art, which was the secondary school basic qualification that 16-year old's attained in the UK). John Lennon is yet another Art School drop-out (from Liverpool College of Art). This "music made by Art students" was seen as something a little more educated (for want of a better word) than, as Micky would put it, the 'blue-collar' image normally associated with Pop music at the time. That social class distinction of Pop Music being uneducated working class and Classical Music (i.e. Art Music) being University-educated Upper Class is still prevalent over here today to some extent, with these (predominately) middle-class, Art School educated, Art Rock musicians caught in that 'neither one nor t'other' limbo between them, (which is where, as we know, Prog Rock developed from). The idea that Art Rock was a loftier ambition that purported to elevate music out of the musicologist "Pop Music" classification and into the "Art Music" classification that is generally associated with Classical Music, is a later association in the UK, and one I suspect is an import from the USA where Prog Rock and Art Rock were indeed synonymous. As they switched their allegiance to the Punk Rock upstarts in the latter quarter of the 1970s, that British rock journalists regarded Prog Rock as 'pretentious' can be seen as part of that class divide that was then present in Pop Music rather than a dismissal of the notion that Pop Music can be Art (Music). {Muso-Journalists later disdain of Prog Rock was never about the music - it was a faux class-war}.
Edited by Dean - March 20 2017 at 01:49 |
||
What?
|
||
moshkito
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 16175 |
Posted: March 19 2017 at 15:17 | |
Hi, Nicely written, Dean. It's hard to discuss this in America, because things here are way too commercial, and the music scene has been so since Woodstock, when a few folks realized ... half a million sales? And there is the famous story of the follow up, for the greed and what not. Check the Tom Dowd story in his early days, for more on this! In Wisconsin (Madison, specifically) we went to see Steve Miller, Ben Vereen, Otis Redding (sadly never arrived as the plane fell into the semi frozen lake), Jimi, Janis, Doors, Chicago, not because they were "art", but because they spoke for us a lot more than the bubble gum rendition of the AM radio band that ran the gamut ... FM, did not really start kicking here until probably 1968 and 1969, when all of these folk's music kinda disappeared from the AM band, and turned up in the FM band, along with a lot of new things few people knew and got happy and attached to. This has been my experience. I ONLY reflect some of the works as art, when the ambition, is much further away from us in terms of the literary/art/music history ... a work that sticks to your mind and will not go away. For me, for example, Passion Play, TFTO, TlLDOB, Tommy, and many other things, are ambitious works that in many ways went beyond the idea of just a pop song, even if some parts or pieces became so famous, as was the case with Tommy. By the end of the 60's (in America!), I really thought, and still do, that rock music (includes folk and jazz -- kinda meaning stuff done by our generation) was becoming a lot more inventive and creative than the majority of classical music, which ended up re-starting the "hero" and "fame" routine for many of its most well known musicians (not that some were not already well known before ... just like movie stars!), and totally forgot the music itself ... even Leonard Bernstein (earlier) had gone "rock" (so to speak) with West Side Story, which had very little to show for "classical" and a lot to do with "movie musical" and a lot more inventive in the emotional side of things, which was one of the major ideas in rock music, not necessarily pop music. The NY dance and theater scene was incredible and had a lot of well developed things as well, even if defining these as art, would have a lot of people going ... you're kidding me ... and force an evaluation of what art really is, as is the case with Andy Warhol! Turn on the camera and watch two people sleep! Paris and London were no different. The perfect image for me on this, is Jethro Tull's cover for "Passion Play" ... it felt to me like classical works were over and it was time for something else ... and it was OUR GENERATION that stood up and pretty much blasted the rest of the music waves ... to our great appreciation. My definition of art, is spotty, and like everyone else's can be easily dismantled ... with only one difference ... for me "art" is not about my preferences! And I think this is an important point to be made about it all. I was not a great fan of Miles Davis, but 50 years later, I can see almost the same rebelliousness that Pablo Picasso had ... I do what I want kind of thing ... and some of it is transcendental for many of us, even if we sometimes think that this kind of reactionary work does not necessarily fit to be described as "art".
Edited by moshkito - March 19 2017 at 15:18 |
||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
||
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |