Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Sexual Misconduct Allegations
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedSexual Misconduct Allegations

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2017 at 03:56
Sexual abuse is rife across all demographics. The rich and famous are better connected and therefore better able to cover their tracks. All of these liberal Hollywood luvvies that are now falling from grace were all connected to the political establishment, in particular the democrat party. In the UK, the likes of Jimmy Saville was close friends with numerous prime ministers and senior royals. His crimes were known by many for decades. Had he been an avarage Joe who worked in an office or a coffee shop he would have been shopped and concivted 30 years ago.

Hewas described here as a 'national treasure' although most people I know regarded him as a creep. Those calling him a national treasure appeared to be those in high places who knew him, and I believe, knew what he was up to.
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Thatfabulousalien View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 27 2016
Location: Aussie/NZ
Status: Offline
Points: 1409
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2017 at 22:03
Originally posted by Vompatti Vompatti wrote:

It's shocking how practically all of these sexual monsters are relatively wealthy and successful men. What is it about money that drives men to such actions?



No, it's that rich people have a way to getting away with it. But not everyone stays at the top of the ladder forever. Once allegations are able to come out, we are shocked that people we like or know of, happen to be disgusting people.

But we tend to be more strung up about it with celebrities probably because people who are more lower or middle class like the rest of us get locked up faster and in greater numbers
Classical music isn't dead, it's more alive than it's ever been. It's just not on MTV.

https://www.soundcloud.com/user-322914325
Back to Top
ForestFriend View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 23 2017
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 680
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2017 at 20:59
Originally posted by Vompatti Vompatti wrote:

It's shocking how practically all of these sexual monsters are relatively wealthy and successful men. What is it about money that drives men to such actions?


I don't think it has anything to do with money - it's just that we don't hear about all the unknown men who get accused.
Back to Top
siLLy puPPy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic

Joined: October 05 2013
Location: SFcaUsA
Status: Offline
Points: 14754
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2017 at 20:48
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

I don't know, what is there to prove?   Most of these men aren't being prosecuted or even indicted, they're being fired.   Just like many women have been fired because they wouldn't welcome some horny loser's advances.  

McCarthy?   Give me a break-- Joe McCarthy was  a vicious, racist drunk who should've been taken out well before he was removed from HUAC.   He destroyed whole families, marriages and lives.   To compare this with McCarthyism is disproportionate and misled.



If someone is going to be imprisoned, fired or punished in any way for mere allegations would constitute the very antithesis of what the American justice system supposedly represents. I would doubt anybody would argue that women who have been fired unjustly shouldn't be investigated with as many resources as it takes to get to the bottom of these cases. There are, however, women who have cried wolf in the past and made false accusations when they didn't get their way. Granted that they are the minority but do exist nevertheless.

I didn't take the McCarthy comment as being an equivalency. It's more of a comparison of where these things lead if we allow these kinds of speculative punishments turn into what someone else called a witch hunt. In other words, nipping the MF in the bud before it sprouts into a noxious weed. McCarthyism was a horrible time and this is not the same but the fear of it becoming so always looms when such hysteria presents itself because of how things can possibly snowball into such lunacy.

Personally i believe most of these women and hope all these cases are investigated thoroughly however i am a firm believer as well that one is innocent until proven guilty otherwise there is really no reason for any sort of jurisprudence whatsover now is there? Having said that, i can't say i'm shedding any tears for all this rich bloated pampered celebs who have fallen from their perch.


Edited by siLLy puPPy - November 29 2017 at 20:51

https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy
Back to Top
The Dark Elf View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 12738
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2017 at 19:40
Originally posted by The.Crimson.King The.Crimson.King wrote:

Agreed.  While the majority of these allegations are likely true, it isn't below some people to make false claims knowing their targets will be tarred and feathered in the media before a proper investigation has even begun.  If the allegations are false, then the accusers should be prosecuted to the full extent or sued for damages in civil court...if they are true, then that has to be prosecuted just as seriously, but ruining someone's career solely based on an un-investigated accusation seems like a witch hunt.

You know, I had a long damn post all typed out but the f*cking captcha ate it again! Stupid f*cking process that hurts the posters but not the spammers.

Short version: Men of power have been taking advantage of women in the workplace forever. Ailes, O'Reilly, Cosby -- a multitude of accusers and millions in attorney fees and settlements.

Harvey Weinstein, a known pig in the film industry, and Hollywood has had that issue for nearly 100 years. The "casting couch" was said with a nod and a wink for years (you either played the game or never worked again).

Donald Trump and Bill Clinton were cock hounds for decades partying with convicted pedophile billionaire Jeffrey Epstein, who plead guilty to soliciting minors for prostitution, spent 13 months in jail, and had to reach monetary settlements with 40 women (yes, that's forty). Epstein and Trump allegedly raped a 15 year old together as well:


Of Epstein, Trump said of him in 2002 (he was convicted in 2008), “I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”

Where there are accusations that run up to 16 different women (in Trump's case), you have to ask yourself not whether they are being truthful, but rather what is the nature of justice in the U.S. that has allowed millionaires and billionaires to get away with it this long?


Edited by The Dark Elf - November 29 2017 at 19:42
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
Back to Top
npjnpj View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 05 2007
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 2720
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2017 at 18:31
Re Trump's accusers: it's just one of those things that get lost because there's such a lot of stuff going down on a daily basis that it's become impossible to keep track.

It's all a fog bank inside a fog bank inside a fog bank.

Just one example: does anyone even remember Puerto Rico anymore? That was on 4th September this year; only ten weeks back and still ongoing. Seems like years ago.

But back to the subject: it's been puzzling me for a while that the US seems to find it necessary to have this thing called something along the lines of "workplace harassment and discrimination training" in a lot of companies, and which is now going to be implemented in the US senate. Seriously? I'd have expected more from the average senator or congressman without such training being necessary (please understand that the president is excluded from that statement). You live and learn, though.

Does that really mean that the average employee or politician, on learning that it might be frowned upon if you nonchalantly squeeze a tit or fondle a fanny in passing, would reply: "Fancy that; I didn't know! I certainly won't do it again, I promise." Everyone knows that that's a no-no, training or not. What's the bloody point?

Here's an idea: years ago smokers got a break for so many minutes every few hours to go and have a fag. Perhaps companies, parliaments, and senates should have a communal room, like a small cinema, where porn is shown all day and everyone could go and have a comfortable w**k every two hours. You could call it the Procreation Room. Have special theme days. Perhaps even make it compulsory. That should ease a lot of the pressure. Problem solved.


Edited by npjnpj - November 29 2017 at 19:25
Back to Top
Vompatti View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: elsewhere
Status: Offline
Points: 67382
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2017 at 17:49
Originally posted by The.Crimson.King The.Crimson.King wrote:

Originally posted by npjnpj npjnpj wrote:

Agreed, I get your point.

I have to concede that Donald Trump is a vicious, racist tea totaler, so that's a world of difference. Sorry about that.


Well, since you mention him...I was just thinking how strange it is that the dozen or so women who accused him of sexual misconduct during the campaign have just magically all seemed to vanish from public view.  Where are they and why have they gone silent?  You'd think with all the press given to Roy Moore/Al Franken/other politicians and their past misdeeds that the accusations against Trump would surface again.
 
Have these women all been bought off with settlements and non-disclosure agreements?  Have they been intimidated by Trump attorney's with their cease-and-desist letters?  Were they really valid accusations in the first place?  Don't really know for sure what to believe about the accuracy of these claims but I'd really like to know what the real story is.  If they're true, Mr T has a lot of explaining to do.

As likely as women are to win these sorts of cases without any evidence it would make sense that they thought false accusations against the president might be too much of a gamble.
Back to Top
AFlowerKingCrimson View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 16408
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2017 at 17:27
Yeah, I won't use the term "witch hunt" either but it does seem to be almost an epidemic now. It's just one after the other with the latest apparently being Matt Lauer. Being a fan of public radio they also mentioned Garrison Keilor but he said he touched a woman by accident and meant to pat her on the back. Ummm, ok. Could be. I wasn't there. 
Back to Top
The.Crimson.King View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 29 2013
Location: WA
Status: Offline
Points: 4591
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2017 at 17:23
Originally posted by npjnpj npjnpj wrote:

Agreed, I get your point.

I have to concede that Donald Trump is a vicious, racist tea totaler, so that's a world of difference. Sorry about that.


Well, since you mention him...I was just thinking how strange it is that the dozen or so women who accused him of sexual misconduct during the campaign have just magically all seemed to vanish from public view.  Where are they and why have they gone silent?  You'd think with all the press given to Roy Moore/Al Franken/other politicians and their past misdeeds that the accusations against Trump would surface again.
 
Have these women all been bought off with settlements and non-disclosure agreements?  Have they been intimidated by Trump attorney's with their cease-and-desist letters?  Were they really valid accusations in the first place?  Don't really know for sure what to believe about the accuracy of these claims but I'd really like to know what the real story is.  If they're true, Mr T has a lot of explaining to do.
Back to Top
npjnpj View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 05 2007
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 2720
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2017 at 16:55
Agreed, I get your point.

I have to concede that Donald Trump is a vicious, racist tea totaler, so that's a world of difference. Sorry about that.
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 64460
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2017 at 16:24
I don't know, what is there to prove?   Most of these men aren't being prosecuted or even indicted, they're being fired.   Just like many women have been fired because they wouldn't welcome some horny loser's advances.  

McCarthy?   Give me a break-- Joe McCarthy was  a vicious, racist drunk who should've been taken out well before he was removed from HUAC.   He destroyed whole families, marriages and lives.   To compare this with McCarthyism is disproportionate and misled.


"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
Tapfret View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 12 2007
Location: Bryant, Wa
Status: Offline
Points: 8577
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2017 at 13:57
^It's a sense of entitlement. Plain and simple.
Back to Top
Vompatti View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: elsewhere
Status: Offline
Points: 67382
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2017 at 13:34
It's shocking how practically all of these sexual monsters are relatively wealthy and successful men. What is it about money that drives men to such actions?
Back to Top
Barbu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 09 2005
Location: infinity
Status: Offline
Points: 30845
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2017 at 13:08
These types of behaviour must be taken very seriously, of course, but this is quickly turning into a case of collective psychosis.

Hard for me not to laugh in the face of such things.
Back to Top
The.Crimson.King View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 29 2013
Location: WA
Status: Offline
Points: 4591
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2017 at 12:17
Agreed.  While the majority of these allegations are likely true, it isn't below some people to make false claims knowing their targets will be tarred and feathered in the media before a proper investigation has even begun.  If the allegations are false, then the accusers should be prosecuted to the full extent or sued for damages in civil court...if they are true, then that has to be prosecuted just as seriously, but ruining someone's career solely based on an un-investigated accusation seems like a witch hunt.
Back to Top
siLLy puPPy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic

Joined: October 05 2013
Location: SFcaUsA
Status: Offline
Points: 14754
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2017 at 11:48
I agree

https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy
Back to Top
npjnpj View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 05 2007
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 2720
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2017 at 11:42
Concerning all the sexual misconduct allegations, not just in politics, but in general:

Don’t get me wrong; I am pretty convinced that all those women are telling the truth and the perpetrators should suffer the consequences of their actions, but whatever happened to “innocent until proven guilty” as an essential factor in western law?

Again, to be clear, the culprits should be punished, but within the confines of the law, just as it applies to any other alleged crimes.

I’m leaving aside the unpleasant matter of determining the truth in these cases, especially for the accusers. That’s a giant and extremely delicate process I don’t intend to get into at the moment for reasons of subject constraint at this point.

But: people getting fired from their jobs or positions without due process seems something that could well open the floodgates to misuse.

If anyone ill-intentioned sees that any allegation is sufficient to get people discredited or lose their jobs, it will inevitably lead to a multitude of unfounded but credible sounding accusations just to get rid of a rival, a boss, an unwanted subordinate, and, and, and. Where will it end?

As unpleasant as it seems, I think that the accused should remain in their posts (unless substantial proof is provided or they step down voluntarily), until the matter is officially settled.

Of course that would lead to extremely nasty circumstances, such we might see with Roy Moore as senator, if he were elected, but people getting fired or forced to resign purely on the accusers’ words just isn’t sufficient in the western system.

We all know what happened during the McCarthy era, when the pure accusation of someone being a communist was enough to land them in jail for years. It seems that a similar path is being set right now.

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.129 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.