Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Influential prog albums
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedInfluential prog albums

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Author
Message
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 01 2005 at 10:16
Originally posted by threefates threefates wrote:

Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

I would say that "Foxtrot" by Genesis is probably more influential than "Brain Salad Surgery", simply because you hear more bands imitating the former style than the latter, not because one is in any way better than the other.

Thats only because it was easier to imitate..

Yeah, right... whatever...

I think it's because Foxtrot is better musically; technically and in overall execution (although I might concede that Lake's vocals are the superior - however he loses points on lyrics).

Banks simply owns Emerson - makes Keith look like a hopeful second-leaguer, and Collins is almost impossible to compare to Palmer - they're both brilliant on the two albums we're comparing.

I will also concede that Genesis had two extra members - but would counter that by saying that it's harder to co-ordinate larger numbers of personnel.

 

/edit

I have to take back one of my concessions - Greg's intonation on Brain Salad Surgery is pretty bad - especially on "Jerusalem". The tonal quality may be more pleasant, but Gabriel stays on key with more ease!



Edited by Certif1ed
Back to Top
Sweetnighter View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 24 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1298
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 01 2005 at 10:31
bicker bicker bicker

and of course prog is english guys telling fairytale stories! where have you been?

for mikemon's sake, yes there are other acts, particularly American ones like Kansas, but all told progressive rock is predominantly english and was predominantly popular in Canterbury in the early 70s.
I bleed coffee. When I don't drink coffee, my veins run dry, and I shrivel up and die.
"Banco Del Mutuo Soccorso? Is that like the bank of Italian soccer death or something?" -my girlfriend
Back to Top
arcer View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 01 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1239
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 01 2005 at 10:39
Pink Floyd’s Dark Side of the Moon is without doubt
the most influential record in prog. The mere fact that
it has been in the US Top 100 since its release tells
you all you need to know.
It's combination of killer songwriting, involving
atmospherics, approachable arrangements and
universal themes of alienation, frustration, stress
and dissatisfaction make it hard to resist.
Other records may have been influential on some
later prog rock (Yes, Genesis) but generally their
relevance has been withing narrow confines.
DSOTM has had an influence on music across a
whole host of genres from indie to chill-out, metal to
ambient, techno to post-rock.
It's a no-brainer folks, Dark Side is it.
Back to Top
Fitzcarraldo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1835
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 01 2005 at 11:32

Originally posted by Sweetnighter Sweetnighter wrote:

for mikemon's sake, yes there are other acts, particularly American ones like Kansas, but all told progressive rock is predominantly english and was predominantly popular in Canterbury in the early 70s.

Whoa! Do not, whatever you do, forget the Italians! Bands like BANCO DEL MUTUO SOCCORSO, PFM, MUSEO ROSENBACH, IL BALLETTO DI BRONZO, NEW TROLLS, QUELLA VECCHIA LOCANDA, IL ROVESCIO DELLA MEDAGLIA, METAMORFOSI, LE ORME, CERVELLO, LATTE E MIELE and many more, both in the 1970s and later. I see your use of the word "predominantly", but I don't think it's correct. There are 219 entries in ProgArchives for Italian bands, and 231 entries for English bands (which has PATRICK MORAZ listed, but he's Swiss!). That is not "predominant" in my book.

As for Prog Rock being "predominantly popular in Canterbury in the early 70s", that's just totally wrong.

 

Back to Top
Fitzcarraldo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1835
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 01 2005 at 11:43

By the way, mikemon, you asked about books on Prog. See the following thread:

http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1642&a mp;KW=books

 

Back to Top
Rob The Good View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 17 2004
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Points: 476
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 01 2005 at 20:51
Was Prog in its earliest form Jazz Fusion/Canterbury in the late 60s?
And Jesus said unto John, "come forth and receive eternal life..."
Unfortunately, John came fifth and was stuck with a toaster.
Back to Top
BebieM View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 01 2004
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 854
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 01 2005 at 21:25

@Fitzcarraldo: Also don't forget the Germans ....  they had some brilliant bands and even their own subgenre (Krautrock).

But overall I'd still say prog is mainly a british thing, the "big 5" (KC, Genesis, ELP, PF, Yes) are all british. That does not mean that there isn't good music in the other countries, but the prog's roots and their most famous bands do certainly come from the UK.

Back to Top
Garion81 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 01 2005 at 22:21

Originally posted by arcer arcer wrote:

Pink Floyd’s Dark Side of the Moon is without doubt
the most influential record in prog. The mere fact that
it has been in the US Top 100 since its release tells
you all you need to know.
It's combination of killer songwriting, involving
atmospherics, approachable arrangements and
universal themes of alienation, frustration, stress
and dissatisfaction make it hard to resist.
Other records may have been influential on some
later prog rock (Yes, Genesis) but generally their
relevance has been withing narrow confines.
DSOTM has had an influence on music across a
whole host of genres from indie to chill-out, metal to
ambient, techno to post-rock.
It's a no-brainer folks, Dark Side is it.

 

Totally disagree with that. DSOTM was popular sure but the most influencial?  Not likely since it came  out long after other albums of the period were already done.   I know a lot of people love Floyd here but this is just a bit over the top. Are you trying to say that looking back or that it was when it came out?



Edited by Garion81


"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"
Back to Top
Garion81 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 01 2005 at 22:33
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

Banks simply owns Emerson - makes Keith look like a hopeful second-leaguer, and Collins is almost impossible to compare to Palmer - they're both brilliant on the two albums we're comparing.

I will also concede that Genesis had two extra members - but would counter that by saying that it's harder to co-ordinate larger numbers of personnel.

 

/edit

I have to take back one of my concessions - Greg's intonation on Brain Salad Surgery is pretty bad - especially on "Jerusalem". The tonal quality may be more pleasant, but Gabriel stays on key with more ease!

 

A hopeful second stringer?  Hey they are 1-2 on my list of keyboard players but Tony never played a piece of  muisc like Karn Evil 9 second impression on a piano ever.



Edited by Garion81


"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 02 2005 at 09:54
No - that's why
Back to Top
Fitzcarraldo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1835
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 02 2005 at 10:59
Originally posted by BebieM BebieM wrote:

@Fitzcarraldo: Also don't forget the Germans ....  they had some brilliant bands and even their own subgenre (Krautrock).

But overall I'd still say prog is mainly a british thing, the "big 5" (KC, Genesis, ELP, PF, Yes) are all british. That does not mean that there isn't good music in the other countries, but the prog's roots and their most famous bands do certainly come from the UK.

I wasn't really forgetting the Germans (or French, or other nationalities), but mainly trying to point out firstly that the word "predominantly" is, in my opinion, not correct, and, secondly, that the Italians were also a big factor in Progressive Rock. Actually, if Prog Rock bands from Italy, Germany, France, USA etc. are also taken into consideration then they would, in total, outnumber the English bands, so "predominantly" would be even more inappropriate a word to use.

Of course GENESIS, YES, PINK FLOYD, ELP and KING CRIMSON were the 'big ones', but I have more albums in my collection from non-English bands than English bands.

By the way, whenever someone writes "England"/"English" in these forums, I always wonder whether they really mean "Britain"/"British". Very often, people - including the British - say "England" when they mean "Britain". In my experience, the vast majority of non-British people say "England" when they mean "Britain".

 



Edited by Fitzcarraldo
Back to Top
arcer View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 01 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1239
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 02 2005 at 11:42

Garion81 wrote: Totally disagree with that. DSOTM was popular sure but the most influencial?  Not likely since it came  out long after other albums of the period were already done.   I know a lot of people love Floyd here but this is just a bit over the top. Are you trying to say that looking back or that it was when it came out?

Yes, I am saying it's the most influential. And I don't think it's not over the top to say so. The existence of a raft of other prog albums previously in no way lessens the impact DSOTM had when it came out and the mark it continues to make on popular music.

Popularity is just part of the equation. If you class DSOTM as prog then it is simply THE most popular prog album ever made - now well over 30 million copies sold - this knocks the entire careers of most other bands into a cocked hat.

But sales alone do not an influence make - Nick Drake sold b***** all records on release but he has since become a major influence on a whole host of musicians.

DSOTM, however, is both popular and namechecked with startling regularity by a host of bands as a major influence on their own music-making. Like I said, from prog to metal to ambient to techno, rock to indie DSOTM has had an enormous impact.

It is that ongoing cultural relevance that makes it, in my opinion, the most influential record in not only prog, but also one of the key recordings in all of rock music - up there with Pet Sounds, Revolver/Sgt Peppers, Let it Bleed/Exile on Main Street, The Velvet Underground's first album, The Doors debut, Ziggy Stardust, Never Mind the Bollocks, Nevermind, Talking Book as one of the most important popular music recordings of the second half of the 20th century.

I love Yes, Genesis, Rush et al but their impact on rock and pop music as a whole is significantly less than Floyd's.

Back to Top
Prog_Bassist View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 29 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 830
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 02 2005 at 12:00
Originally posted by arcer arcer wrote:

Pink Floyd’s Dark Side of the Moon is without doubt
the most influential record in prog. The mere fact that
it has been in the US Top 100 since its release tells
you all you need to know.
It's combination of killer songwriting, involving
atmospherics, approachable arrangements and
universal themes of alienation, frustration, stress
and dissatisfaction make it hard to resist.
Other records may have been influential on some
later prog rock (Yes, Genesis) but generally their
relevance has been withing narrow confines.
DSOTM has had an influence on music across a
whole host of genres from indie to chill-out, metal to
ambient, techno to post-rock.
It's a no-brainer folks, Dark Side is it.


Plus it's one of the most overrated records of all time .

Don't get me wrong, it's a really good record, I like it and I like pink floyd, but I think it's been taken too far in terms of popularity. But that's just my opinion.

I think the reason why it's so popular is because the world was full of potheads.
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 02 2005 at 17:17

I think we're talking about influential, not about our favorites, IMO this are a group ofvthe most influential albums:

  1. In the Court of the Crimson King: Defined the genre, probably the first 100% progressive album
  2. The Lamb Lies Down on Broadway: An icon of the prog' culture, redefined the term conceptual album.
  3. Dark Side of the Moon: The most popular progressive album, been a long time the best selling album in progressive history
  4. Close to the Edge: The peak of Yes, one of the most famous prog' bands, almost defines the term epic.
  5. Trilogy: The Peak of ELP, one of the best structured bands of the genre
  6. Thick as a Brick: Mixed the terms concept and Epic in one album.
  7. Per un Amico: Proves good Progressive Rock albums can be released outside UK
  8. Look at Yourself: IMO the first Prog' Metal album by Uriah Heep.
  9. A Trick of the Tail: According to many people it defined Neo Progressive.
  10. Song for America: IMO the best progressive album done in USA.

Now the second part, influential Bands in which sense and what parameters must we use?:

Proto Prog:

  1. Frank Zappa
  2. Arthur Brown
  3. The Beatles

The big 5:

  1. Genesis (Symphonic)
  2. Yes (Symphonic)
  3. ELP (Symphonic even when they are considered classical Prog')
  4. King Crimson (A genre of their own)
  5. Pink Floyd (Space/Psychodelia)

Folk Prog

  1. Jethro Tull
  2. The Strawbs
  3. Renaissance
  4. Fairport Convention

USA Prog:

  1. Kansas
  2. Frank Zappa and the Mothers of Invention
  3. Pavlov's Dog
  4. Glass Hammer

Neo Prog:

  1. Marillion
  2. Pendragon
  3. IQ

Prog Metal:

  1. Uriah Heep
  2. Dream Theater
  3. Rush

Italian Prog:

  1. PFM
  2. Banco del Mutuo Soccorso
  3. Le Orme

Scandinavian Progressive:

  1. Anglagard
  2. Par Lindh Project
  3. Anekdoten

Other countries:

  1. Focus (Netherlands)
  2. Triumvirat (Germany)
  3. Rush (Canada)
  4. Ange (France)

And I'm missing a lot of influencial bands and points of view.

Iván

 

Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 02 2005 at 17:44

I don't want to start a mad rush, but how could you miss out the Soft Machine or the Mahavishnu Orchestra?

Also PFM sound to me like they have a conglomerate sound - they wear their influences on their sleeves too clearly for me to consider them as influential as the bands they were obviously influenced by (Great band, tho').

Er...

Great lists otherwise, Ivan!

 

Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 02 2005 at 18:20

Quote I don't want to start a mad rush, but how could you miss out the Soft Machine or the Mahavishnu Orchestra?

Absolutely agree with you Cert, that's why I said "And I'm missing a lot of influencial bands and points of view", if anybody would name influential bands, would have to mention of course Mahavishnu as a fusion influence, some Kraut, etc, but it would takea lot of  hours and pages.

About PFM I absolutely disagree, all italian bands have clear influence from UK bands, PFM and Banco from ELP (They even signed with Manticore I believe) Le Orme from Yes and Genesis, but all have a clear Italian sound that makes the difference. After all they were the first generation of prog' bands outside UK and of course they received influence from the pioneers of the genre.

Iván

Back to Top
threefates View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 30 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4215
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 02 2005 at 19:33
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

Yeah, right... whatever...

I think it's because Foxtrot is better musically; technically and in overall execution (although I might concede that Lake's vocals are the superior - however he loses points on lyrics).

Definitely don't agree with that... the first 5 ELP albums had the best production their was.. and it well stands the test of time... Can't say that about any of the Genesis albums.. as far as production is concerned.  And Greg's lyrics were genius, now some of Pete's were funny...but still genius..

Banks simply owns Emerson - makes Keith look like a hopeful second-leaguer, and Collins is almost impossible to compare to Palmer - they're both brilliant on the two albums we're comparing.

That not only made me laugh... but I could hear RichardH laughing all the way from Swindon...  Tony Banks is still praying for the day when he could even shine Emerson's boots...

I will also concede that Genesis had two extra members - but would counter that by saying that it's harder to co-ordinate larger numbers of personnel.

And even with the extra 2 members, the never sounded as full as ELP...

/edit

I have to take back one of my concessions - Greg's intonation on Brain Salad Surgery is pretty bad - especially on "Jerusalem". The tonal quality may be more pleasant, but Gabriel stays on key with more ease!

Must be the perfect pitch.. cause I never heard a bad moment in Jerusalem... and the fact that it still puts chills down my back... when nothing Gabriel has ever sang did that to me... then I think you're wrong there too...

THIS IS ELP
Back to Top
Garion81 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 03 2005 at 11:49
Originally posted by arcer arcer wrote:

Garion81 wrote: Totally disagree with that. DSOTM was popular sure but the most influencial?  Not likely since it came  out long after other albums of the period were already done.   I know a lot of people love Floyd here but this is just a bit over the top. Are you trying to say that looking back or that it was when it came out?

Yes, I am saying it's the most influential. And I don't think it's not over the top to say so. The existence of a raft of other prog albums previously in no way lessens the impact DSOTM had when it came out and the mark it continues to make on popular music.

I thought this was influential on Prog?  Did I miss that point if so I am sorry. If it is on the enitre pop scene I can see your point.

Popularity is just part of the equation. If you class DSOTM as prog then it is simply THE most popular prog album ever made - now well over 30 million copies sold - this knocks the entire careers of most other bands into a cocked hat.

I don't really and  never have even when the album came out.  I know there are many here that do.  I understand the sales figures but "Framton comes Alive" did much better than that.  Would you list that album in your most influential?   

But sales alone do not an influence make - Nick Drake sold b***** all records on release but he has since become a major influence on a whole host of musicians.

DSOTM, however, is both popular and namechecked with startling regularity by a host of bands as a major influence on their own music-making. Like I said, from prog to metal to ambient to techno, rock to indie DSOTM has had an enormous impact.

 

Not to metion on the legions who were stoned .   

It is that ongoing cultural relevance that makes it, in my opinion, the most influential record in not only prog, but also one of the key recordings in all of rock music - up there with Pet Sounds, Revolver/Sgt Peppers, Let it Bleed/Exile on Main Street, The Velvet Underground's first album, The Doors debut, Ziggy Stardust, Never Mind the Bollocks, Nevermind, Talking Book as one of the most important popular music recordings of the second half of the 20th century.

 

The Velet Undergorund? Oh man that group is so overated. I can not beleive so many people think their album was influential. That point of view has come from hindsight because I don't remember anyone I grew up with muscian or not ever owning that album or admiting that it influenced them in any way.  You might put Led Zeppelin 4 in that mix based on your criteria.

I love Yes, Genesis, Rush et al but their impact on rock and pop music as a whole is significantly less than Floyd's.

Again I made my argument with this album influential on prog groups. 



"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 03 2005 at 12:19

Quote That not only made me laugh... but I could hear RichardH laughing all the way from Swindon...  Tony Banks is still praying for the day when he could even shine Emerson's boots...

I don't know, but this sounds offensive to me, Tony Banks may not have the technicall skills of Keith Emerson or Rick Wakeman (N°1 IMO), but he's a solid keyboard player very near to both in the top.

While Keith was stabbing keyboards or playing with ribbons and Wakeman acting as a stand up comedian, Tony Banks was only worried about his music and giving 110% for his band, dsomething the other two never did, Wakeman and Emerson were always worried to shine over the rest of their bandmates while Tony was a part of a well oiled machine that was called early Genesis.

Iván

Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 03 2005 at 12:44
Originally posted by threefates threefates wrote:

Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

Yeah, right... whatever...

I think it's because Foxtrot is better musically; technically and in overall execution (although I might concede that Lake's vocals are the superior - however he loses points on lyrics).

Definitely don't agree with that... the first 5 ELP albums had the best production their was.. and it well stands the test of time... Can't say that about any of the Genesis albums.. as far as production is concerned.  And Greg's lyrics were genius, now some of Pete's were funny...but still genius..

Banks simply owns Emerson - makes Keith look like a hopeful second-leaguer, and Collins is almost impossible to compare to Palmer - they're both brilliant on the two albums we're comparing.

That not only made me laugh... but I could hear RichardH laughing all the way from Swindon...  Tony Banks is still praying for the day when he could even shine Emerson's boots...

I will also concede that Genesis had two extra members - but would counter that by saying that it's harder to co-ordinate larger numbers of personnel.

And even with the extra 2 members, the never sounded as full as ELP...

/edit

I have to take back one of my concessions - Greg's intonation on Brain Salad Surgery is pretty bad - especially on "Jerusalem". The tonal quality may be more pleasant, but Gabriel stays on key with more ease!

Must be the perfect pitch.. cause I never heard a bad moment in Jerusalem... and the fact that it still puts chills down my back... when nothing Gabriel has ever sang did that to me... then I think you're wrong there too...

Threefates is too close to the subject matter to be objective so it is pointless even entering into discussion with her about ELP.Confused

 




Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.