Joined: April 12 2013
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 470
Topic: XTC, Rod Argent, Garfield Posted: May 01 2013 at 18:54
someone_else wrote:
Not really, I think. But it is a very clever album, a fine example of a New Wave band that has lifted up its music to a higher level.
Note: another New Wave band, Talking Heads, is included in Prog Related.
Joined: September 20 2010
Location: Serbia
Status: Offline
Points: 10213
Posted: April 26 2013 at 05:53
Dean wrote:
Svetonio wrote:
Dean wrote:
There is little doubt that some of the more talented musicians who came to prominence in the 80s would have formed Prog bands if they had been around in the 70s - that's not quite the same as claiming that those musicians were Prog musicians in hiding. Partridge, Moulding, Chambers and Andrews were in a band from 1973 - they were never Prog during that time though may have listened to it (Colin Moulding has said he listened to Tull in the 70s) - and of course Glam Rock and Psychedelic Pop figured as a strong influences on them.
I don't care about Partridge, Moulding, Chambers and Andrews. Let's imagine that there was nothing recorded by King Crimson before Discipline the album; at the time of the appearance of the album in stores, KC would be valid for New Wave flawless.
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Posted: April 26 2013 at 05:22
Svetonio wrote:
Dean wrote:
There is little doubt that some of the more talented musicians who came to prominence in the 80s would have formed Prog bands if they had been around in the 70s - that's not quite the same as claiming that those musicians were Prog musicians in hiding. Partridge, Moulding, Chambers and Andrews were in a band from 1973 - they were never Prog during that time though may have listened to it (Colin Moulding has said he listened to Tull in the 70s) - and of course Glam Rock and Psychedelic Pop figured as a strong influences on them.
I don't care about Partridge, Moulding, Chambers and Andrews. Let's imagine that there was nothing recorded by King Crimson before Discipline the album; at the time of the appearance of the album in stores, KC would be valid for New Wave flawless.
Joined: September 20 2010
Location: Serbia
Status: Offline
Points: 10213
Posted: April 26 2013 at 05:19
Dean wrote:
There is little doubt that some of the more talented musicians who came to prominence in the 80s would have formed Prog bands if they had been around in the 70s - that's not quite the same as claiming that those musicians were Prog musicians in hiding. Partridge, Moulding, Chambers and Andrews were in a band from 1973 - they were never Prog during that time though may have listened to it (Colin Moulding has said he listened to Tull in the 70s) - and of course Glam Rock and Psychedelic Pop figured as a strong influences on them.
I don't care about Partridge, Moulding, Chambers and Andrews. Let's imagine that there was nothing recorded by King Crimson before Discipline the album; at the time of the appearance of the album in stores, KC would be valid for New Wave flawless.
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Posted: April 25 2013 at 12:46
There is little doubt that some of the more talented musicians who came to prominence in the 80s would have formed Prog bands if they had been around in the 70s - that's not quite the same as claiming that those musicians were Prog musicians in hiding. Partridge, Moulding, Chambers and Andrews were in a band from 1973 - they were never Prog during that time though may have listened to it (Colin Moulding has said he listened to Tull in the 70s) - and of course Glam Rock and Psychedelic Pop figured as a strong influences on them.
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Posted: April 25 2013 at 08:39
^Punk? Maybe. Punks like their first Science Friction EP and it certainly has that homemade garage band vibe. Fits right into the Punk ethos. The debut album expanded on that. Less punky for sure but still a series of short sharp (clever) songs. They kind of grew from there. Flowered. So more New wave than actual Punk. But never prog.
Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20047
Posted: April 25 2013 at 07:01
Svetonio wrote:
stegor wrote:
Funny - XTC was the first non-prog band I looked for when I was trying to find the edge of the Prog boundaries as drawn by ProgArchives. They weren't here, but it was evident that it wasn't because they weren't considered, based on the depth and width and breadth of the map.
But it didn't surprise me. XTC showed up with punk, and were instrumental in dismantling Prog right along with the Sex Pistols. I noticed that PIL, Magazine and Shriekback are missing also, which suggests to me that it's not just the style of music that designates Prog, it's also the effect that the artist had on Prog culture. Never mind that XTC was influenced by BeBop Deluxe, The Residents and Beefheart, they were here to slay the dinosaurs.
So from that angle I can see why they could be considered Anti-Prog.
But by killing prog they rescued it. It couldn't go on like it was. Not with Love Beach. Prog had jumped the shark. XTC was like a stealth bomber. Or maybe a Trojan horse. They looked like punk, sounded like punk, smelled like punk, and kicked Greg Lake's arse.
But if you were paying attention, you might have noticed that songs like X-Wires, from their debut album, sounded more like Beefheart than The Sex Pistols. And then, when we least expected it, after they wiped out Tull, ELP, Yes and Genesis, they served up a full-on capital P Progressive Rock double album: English Settlement. Clever little pricks.
So personally, I can see how they shouldn't be included, and at the same time see how they should be considered the most important Prog band of the '80's. I don't know what I would have done without them.
There is no doubt that the XTC were Prog band hidden behind the Punk / New Wave outfit. Probably so they had to survive in the business in the middle of the Punk histeria; then they became stars and that was it.
Well there's doubt here. I don't see them as a prog band hidden or not. I wouldn't call them punk, even at the beginning, either.
Joined: September 20 2010
Location: Serbia
Status: Offline
Points: 10213
Posted: April 24 2013 at 15:59
chopper wrote:
stegor wrote:
Funny - XTC was the first non-prog band I looked for when I was trying to find the edge of the Prog boundaries as drawn by ProgArchives. They weren't here, but it was evident that it wasn't because they weren't considered, based on the depth and width and breadth of the map.
But it didn't surprise me. XTC showed up with punk, and were instrumental in dismantling Prog right along with the Sex Pistols. I noticed that PIL, Magazine and Shriekback are missing also, which suggests to me that it's not just the style of music that designates Prog, it's also the effect that the artist had on Prog culture. Never mind that XTC was influenced by BeBop Deluxe, The Residents and Beefheart, they were here to slay the dinosaurs.
So from that angle I can see why they could be considered Anti-Prog.
But by killing prog they rescued it. It couldn't go on like it was. Not with Love Beach. Prog had jumped the shark. XTC was like a stealth bomber. Or maybe a Trojan horse. They looked like punk, sounded like punk, smelled like punk, and kicked Greg Lake's arse.
But if you were paying attention, you might have noticed that songs like X-Wires, from their debut album, sounded more like Beefheart than The Sex Pistols. And then, when we least expected it, after they wiped out Tull, ELP, Yes and Genesis, they served up a full-on capital P Progressive Rock double album: English Settlement. Clever little pricks.
So personally, I can see how they shouldn't be included, and at the same time see how they should be considered the most important Prog band of the '80's. I don't know what I would have done without them.
XTC killed prog? I thought the Clash had already done that. (...)
I disagree. On contrary, Clash's London Callingthe album was "destroyed" Punk, not Prog.Mr Stevens, as a great producer with weird ideas, then was changed the guidelines of the genre; London Calling was Sgt. Pepper of Punk.
Joined: September 20 2010
Location: Serbia
Status: Offline
Points: 10213
Posted: April 24 2013 at 15:25
stegor wrote:
Funny - XTC was the first non-prog band I looked for when I was trying to find the edge of the Prog boundaries as drawn by ProgArchives. They weren't here, but it was evident that it wasn't because they weren't considered, based on the depth and width and breadth of the map.
But it didn't surprise me. XTC showed up with punk, and were instrumental in dismantling Prog right along with the Sex Pistols. I noticed that PIL, Magazine and Shriekback are missing also, which suggests to me that it's not just the style of music that designates Prog, it's also the effect that the artist had on Prog culture. Never mind that XTC was influenced by BeBop Deluxe, The Residents and Beefheart, they were here to slay the dinosaurs.
So from that angle I can see why they could be considered Anti-Prog.
But by killing prog they rescued it. It couldn't go on like it was. Not with Love Beach. Prog had jumped the shark. XTC was like a stealth bomber. Or maybe a Trojan horse. They looked like punk, sounded like punk, smelled like punk, and kicked Greg Lake's arse.
But if you were paying attention, you might have noticed that songs like X-Wires, from their debut album, sounded more like Beefheart than The Sex Pistols. And then, when we least expected it, after they wiped out Tull, ELP, Yes and Genesis, they served up a full-on capital P Progressive Rock double album: English Settlement. Clever little pricks.
So personally, I can see how they shouldn't be included, and at the same time see how they should be considered the most important Prog band of the '80's. I don't know what I would have done without them.
There is no doubt that the XTC were Prog band hidden behind the Punk / New Wave outfit. Probably so they had to survive in the business in the middle of the Punk histeria; then they became stars and that was it.
Funny - XTC was the first non-prog band I looked for when I was trying to find the edge of the Prog boundaries as drawn by ProgArchives. They weren't here, but it was evident that it wasn't because they weren't considered, based on the depth and width and breadth of the map. But it didn't surprise me. XTC showed up with punk, and were instrumental in dismantling Prog right along with the Sex Pistols. I noticed that PIL, Magazine and Shriekback are missing also, which suggests to me that it's not just the style of music that designates Prog, it's also the effect that the artist had on Prog culture. Never mind that XTC was influenced by BeBop Deluxe, The Residents and Beefheart, they were here to slay the dinosaurs.So from that angle I can see why they could be considered Anti-Prog.But by killing prog they rescued it. It couldn't go on like it was. Not with Love Beach. Prog had jumped the shark. XTC was like a stealth bomber. Or maybe a Trojan horse. They looked like punk, sounded like punk, smelled like punk, and kicked Greg Lake's arse. But if you were paying attention, you might have noticed that songs like X-Wires, from their debut album, sounded more like Beefheart than The Sex Pistols. And then, when we least expected it, after they wiped out Tull, ELP, Yes and Genesis, they served up a full-on capital P Progressive Rock double album: English Settlement. Clever little pricks.So personally, I can see how they shouldn't be included, and at the same time see how they should be considered the most important Prog band of the '80's. I don't know what I would have done without them.
XTC killed prog? I thought the Clash had already done that. Slightly ironic then that Dave Gregory ended up playing in 2 prog bands and Andy Partridge has collaborated with Peter Blegvad.
Not really, I think. But it is a very clever album, a fine example of a New Wave band that has lifted up its music to a higher level.
Note: another New Wave band, Talking Heads, is included in Prog Related.
Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20047
Posted: April 24 2013 at 06:50
stegor wrote:
Funny - XTC was the first non-prog band I looked for when I was trying to find the edge of the Prog boundaries as drawn by ProgArchives. They weren't here, but it was evident that it wasn't because they weren't considered, based on the depth and width and breadth of the map.
But it didn't surprise me. XTC showed up with punk, and were instrumental in dismantling Prog right along with the Sex Pistols. I noticed that PIL, Magazine and Shriekback are missing also, which suggests to me that it's not just the style of music that designates Prog, it's also the effect that the artist had on Prog culture. Never mind that XTC was influenced by BeBop Deluxe, The Residents and Beefheart, they were here to slay the dinosaurs.
So from that angle I can see why they could be considered Anti-Prog.
But by killing prog they rescued it. It couldn't go on like it was. Not with Love Beach. Prog had jumped the shark. XTC was like a stealth bomber. Or maybe a Trojan horse. They looked like punk, sounded like punk, smelled like punk, and kicked Greg Lake's arse.
But if you were paying attention, you might have noticed that songs like X-Wires, from their debut album, sounded more like Beefheart than The Sex Pistols. And then, when we least expected it, after they wiped out Tull, ELP, Yes and Genesis, they served up a full-on capital P Progressive Rock double album: English Settlement. Clever little pricks.
So personally, I can see how they shouldn't be included, and at the same time see how they should be considered the most important Prog band of the '80's. I don't know what I would have done without them.
XTC killed prog? I thought the Clash had already done that. Slightly ironic then that Dave Gregory ended up playing in 2 prog bands and Andy Partridge has collaborated with Peter Blegvad.
Joined: March 23 2013
Location: Minnesota
Status: Online
Points: 2059
Posted: April 23 2013 at 20:26
Wow - that was interesting to look back at. Visage! Fond, poofy memories. I know we're going way off topic now, but All those bands that went down the Bowie/Kraftwerk/Roxy path like Magazine, Ultravox and Gary Numan - I absolutely love them as much as any Prog. But I started listening to them around 1980 precisely because they were NOT Prog. Add to that Polyrock, and some real obscurities like The Units, Experiments With Ice and Ceramic Hello. Then there's OMD. I don't care how hard you try, despite the fact that OMD did some incredibly unique and experimental music they will never be Prog (I just checked to make sure I wouldn't have to eat my words).
Of course OMD is not XTC, so let's get back on topic. All this bickering has distracted everyone from my erudite dissertation on XTC. Now go back there and read it for cryin out loud!
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.164 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.