Duplicated entries

... I accidentally used the wrong front cover picture, and the wrong spelling of the album title. Please delete
http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=41256

I added the correct one. Thanks.

NotAProghead wrote: historian9 wrote: Also you can delete that old album then -> http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=37211 I can't, please send PM to any Admin, only they can delete albums.

I'll reuse that database slot for another album. Problem solved.

I renamed the album. I don't have the ability to change bios but I think it's ok to just add this sentence on Lockwood's page:

Album "Jazz Rock" which Didier LOCKWOOD recorded in 1976 with his brother Francis can be found under Volkor.

Also you can delete that old album then -> http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=37211

I'll just paste what I said in JRF genre thread:

Now a mistake was made, and I guess I should say here and then head to duplicated entries or someplace. Recently we added Volkor which was one of bands Didier Lockwood was in, and sure enough, that album by Volkor is under Didier Lockwood's discography.  The LP was released sometimes under Lockwood and sometimes under Volkor, as I understand it, the new reissues are mostly under Volkor.

So should the artist be removed or just that one album from Lockwood's page or what?

NotAProghead wrote: Please look, guys, I asked this question a year ago: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=81634&KW=wave+reissues. Anyway we can't delete anything without admins.

Easy Livin(Bob) directed me here after asking him similar questions the other day. What moved me to message him was seeing IQ's debut that has been re-issued with bonus material listed seperately in the box set/complilations section. A little confusing when this info of the new version could have been added to the original entry, but i can appreciate that people who have reviewed the original want to talk about the new version and bonus material. Still doesn't this open a whole can of worms ?  Ian already mentioned ELP's debut that has been re-mixed with bonus tracks etc and you can add Caravan's In The Land Of Grey And Pink, and Aqualung and all of King Crimsons early records. I'm okay which ever way this goes but there might need to be some sort of policy but as Bob said as quoted by Ian it's a tricky thing.

^ agreed, was about to report

Floyd Steely wrote: Hi,   Don't know if this has been reported before, but it's something I noticed. The 1995 U2/Brian Eno collab, Passengers "Original Soundtracks 1", appears in the database twice...   Once under Various Artists: http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=14498   and once as an Eno album: http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=34058   Sorry if this was dealt with before. Floyd.

Hi,

^ Sounds the most optimal solution at least to me. If this plan is executed, I'll update the International Harvester bio with hyperlinks and capitals on last names to the biography text.

historian9 wrote: ^Looks like that one was turned into another new band so it's ok now, I guess. It did remind me of something I saw some time ago, there are still two entries for the same guys: International Harvester and Harvester.

Hi,
I quess this has to be a result of lack in information flow.
The case was discussed here, my entry as final post.
The band was evaluated in the psych team of that time, and added by me to psych list as artist id 3006.
As a resolution proposal, if the aritsit is seen mutually as more fitting to raga rock, why not look what extra information entry 5925 holds, merge that to the older band page with more albums + video, and possibly change the genre of the band, with coordination of relevant team members?

On Hemåt, there are no reviews on 5925 page, but there is 1 review on 3006 page, and also 4 reviews on "Sov Gott Rose-Marie" album, not listed to 5925 version.

Hopefully a reasonalbe solution will be found.