SHOCK THE MONKEY

This is my first review of any Peter Gabriel stuff and i chose this song because it got stuck with me for a month, its a pretty entertaining music track.

That's no the only reason why i am in here though... i'm here because of the odd discussion and comparison that many Genesis "fans" do here on Peter Gabriel reviews, like comparing the output of both careers saying that Genesis sold out and Peter was still keeping the Prog flame lit, i find it even more odd when people say that songs like this one are more musically complex that anything Genesis did on the 80s.

So this review will be a little bit different, i don't usually do technical reviews, but this song is so "simple" (to explain musically at least) i might just give it a shot.

Since i was so fascinated with this music piece, i tried to learn it and that revealed me tons about how it was composed, i was able to figure out more than 9 tracks of audio in this particular composition, more than half of those are percussions that sound drastically different from each other, some electronically made, others the real thing. The other thing i learnt about this song is the chords used, of wich there are only 2, i know its strange to have a song with less chords than the most basic Phil Collins stuff, but in this case, the entire song features 1, until it reaches the climax where it changes, the song hooks you in some way and then after lots of repetition the song changes chords wich feels very dramatical, and that's great.

Now compare it to Genesis output during this time, maybe a simple song like "Man on the Corner", wich i don't like, also very repetitive but its the chords that get this piece to life, yet it features like 4 tracks at most. Do you really just need more tracks to make your song more interesting, to give the idea of being more complex? Or is it the structure? Now compare it to REAL progrock stuff like "Firth of Fifth", it has SO much more than what this little repetitive monkey song offers.

Shock the Monkey might be experimental, but is in its simplicity, in its capacity to convey a complex feeling, that's what makes a good music piece, yet it is also hindered by Peter Gabriel saying "Monkey" 46 times during the song, i think that the point of the piece is made much earlier on the running time.

The first time you hear it, it might not click, and then you end up listening to it over and over again, hearing every piece and note that makes this song, after that you might learn it and what you end up is with dissapointment, feeling like you just wasted your time.

Peter Gabriel's strong suit are weird unusual ugly chords, while his mate Tony Banks has the ability to make weird unusual rimbombastic chords, both things that no one would normally use for hit singles, yet Peter managed, compared to Tony also, he doesn't do that many changes or long songs, as he said once "An artist without limits is the death of creative expression" i personally don't agree to a point but his philosphy really paid off in the end.

So, this song is repetitive trash, but good artistic repetitive trash, i was going to give this track 3 stars, but it has so much rating that i'm going to give it just 1, it really doesn't deserve the recomendation for any prog rock music collection, but it is good though.

Share this PETER GABRIEL review

Social review comments () BETA

---

---

Review related links

• Send comments to FalconBleck
• Report this review (#2475023)
• Buy PETER GABRIEL music online with PA partners
• Show all PETER GABRIEL MP3/Stream
• Go to PETER GABRIEL page for videos, full discography with ratings, reviews and much more
• Go to Shock the Monkey page for more details, where to buy and ratings/reviews
• Search the Forum for PETER GABRIEL related discussions