PROTO-PROG

A Progressive Rock Sub-genre


From Progarchives.com, the ultimate progressive rock music website

Bookmark and Share

Proto-Prog definition

The denomination Proto Prog comes from the combination of two words, Proto from the Greek The earliest,. and Prog which as we know is a short term for Progressive Rock, so as it's name clearly indicates, refers to the earliest form of Progressive Rock or Progressive Rock in embryonary state.

These bands normally were formed and released albums before Progressive Rock had completely developed (there are some rare Proto Prog bands from the early 70's, because the genre didn't expanded to all the Continents simultaneously

The common elements in all these bands is that they developed one or more elements of Prog, and even when not completely defined as part of the genre, they are without any doubt, an important stage in the evolution of Progressive Rock.

Generally, Proto Prog bands are the direct link between Psyche and Prog and for that reason the Psychedelic components are present in the vast majority of them, but being that Progressive Rock was born from the blending of different genres, we have broadened the definition to cover any band that combined some elements of Progressive Rock with other genres prior to 1970.

Some of these bands evolved and turned into 100% Prog, while others simply choose another path, but their importance and contribution in the formative period of Prog can't be denied, for that reason no Prog site can ignore them.

Iván Melgar - Morey

Proto-Prog Top Albums


Showing only studios | Based on members ratings & PA algorithm | Show Top 100 Proto-Prog | More Top Prog lists and filters


4.35 | 175 ratings
ABBEY ROAD
Beatles, The

4.47 | 113 ratings
QUADROPHENIA
Who, The

4.33 | 159 ratings
REVOLVER
Beatles, The

4.32 | 127 ratings
THE DOORS
Doors, The

4.17 | 202 ratings
SGT. PEPPER'S LONELY HEARTS CLUB BAND
Beatles, The

4.21 | 169 ratings
IN ROCK
Deep Purple

4.19 | 153 ratings
MACHINE HEAD
Deep Purple

4.27 | 87 ratings
WHO'S NEXT
Who, The

4.08 | 110 ratings
THE BEATLES
Beatles, The

4.06 | 106 ratings
MAGICAL MYSTERY TOUR (US VERSION)
Beatles, The

4.20 | 67 ratings
STRANGE DAYS
Doors, The

3.96 | 75 ratings
RUBBER SOUL
Beatles, The

3.87 | 101 ratings
FIREBALL
Deep Purple

3.93 | 70 ratings
L.A. WOMAN
Doors, The

3.97 | 60 ratings
TOMMY
Who, The

3.85 | 88 ratings
BURN
Deep Purple

4.29 | 27 ratings
TOUCH
Touch

4.34 | 24 ratings
TWELVE DREAMS OF DR. SARDONICUS
Spirit

4.07 | 33 ratings
ARE YOU EXPERIENCED
Hendrix, Jimi

4.03 | 34 ratings
THE CRAZY WORLD OF ARTHUR BROWN
Brown Band, The Arthur

Download (Stream) Free Proto-Prog MP3


Open player in a new window

Download (Stream) Free Proto-Prog MP3

Latest Proto-Prog Music Reviews


 Crown of Creation by JEFFERSON AIRPLANE album cover Studio Album, 1968
4.10 | 26 ratings

BUY
Crown of Creation
Jefferson Airplane Proto-Prog

Review by snobb

4 stars This JA album is recorded still in their strongest period, but the sound is different from their most popular "Surrealistic Pillow" . Instead of acid-psychedelia with some folk and beat, there they play blues-rock based music. Sound is much more clear, plenty of guitar solos all around. Album is better focused and organised. Still some psyhedelia presents for sure, but generally all album is played more in early Zappa vein. All sound is more heavy and more rock.

As some minus I can mention that there are no more so perfect Grace Slick vocals in songs,I think their best works were "White Rabbit"and "Plastic Fantastic Lover". There female vocal is competent, but very average. But all the band sounds more as real band, not as few soloists and some musicians on back-up.

Still being sound of their time, album sound more modern. But anyway, don't think it will be too much interesting for newcomers. For fans of that era it's perfect evidence.

 1962-1966 by BEATLES, THE album cover Boxset/Compilation, 1973
2.84 | 22 ratings

BUY
1962-1966
The Beatles Proto-Prog

Review by toroddfuglesteg

4 stars This is a compilation album which has polarised opinions in PA, I can see.

In my view, all homes should have both this compilation CD and in particular the blue 1967-1970 box. Why ? Because both double CDs are the blueprint for the modern music. To be able to understand the western culture; you need this knowledge. Yes, I know my opinions are controversial. But just have a look around and you may come to the same conclusion. Another reason for the purchase of this and the blue box/double CD is that the music here are mostly superb.

This double CD, the red one, is a collection of the pop stuff from The Beatles. These songs were all pioneering songs. Thankfully, there is no cover songs here. Just their own compositions. That include some songs not released on their albums.

There are some really gems and icons of the western civilisation here (I am again controversial). These are She Loves You, a song debated in many parlaments around the world as a danger to the youths in their respective countries and therefore ought to be banned outright. Yesterday, the most covered song on this planet and a wonderful song. Norwegian Wood with it's sitar. Help which was the title track of a movie that set new standards. Eleanor Rigby with it's serious theme and Yellow Submarine which is a hit in all nursery schools among the 4-5 six years old kids. All these songs are truly wonderful. Add songs like Paperback Writer, A Hard Day's Night, Eight Days A Week, Ticket To Ride, Drive My Car and Michelle to the mix and those are a good reason to purchase this album. The rest of the songs are also very good.

Those alone are the reasons to own this album. Everything properly considered makes this a four star compilation album. Store this double CD together with the Bible, your favorite food recipes, the backup of your harddisk, your insurance details, the pictures of your family, your passport and The Fawlty Towers DVDs.

4 stars

 Help! by BEATLES, THE album cover Studio Album, 1965
3.18 | 61 ratings

BUY
Help!
The Beatles Proto-Prog

Review by bfmuller

4 stars Now here things are starting to get serious. At first glance (or audition), Help not only keeps up with the aesthetics of the previous albums, but also is, in retrospect, still far from any relation with the prog-rock. Both statements couldn't be farthest from the truth.

At this time the suscetibilities of fame were starting to get to The Beatles heads, frustrated with the (bad) quality of the shows to screaming audiences, where they could hardly hear themselves, the busy schedule, the constant harassment from both fans and the press. These all are very clearly stamped in the album's title track (written by John), a song of a person who feels lost, with no direction and, ironically, lonely, pleading for a helping hand.

One can also acknowledge the role that their contact with Bob Dylan (and maybe also drugs) played, along with the stimulus of classical-trained producer George Martin, that instigated them to welcome new sounds and instruments to their repertoire.

And so they did. Of course, there is the never enough mentioned Yesterday, probably their most popular and well-know song, the most re-recorded song in popular music history, covered by hundreds of artists (legend says that this song is ininterruptely played in some version, in some point of the earth). Yesterday features a string quartet in, the earliest example I am aware of in a rock and roll album. If only for this reason, that would deserve the recording and the album a special place in the history of rock and roll and, maybe, music in all forms. Of course, it happens that this is NOT the only reason for the inclusion of Help among the list of the most important and influential albums ever recorded.

There are plenty of novelties that this album has to offer. The clearly Dylan-esque song You've Got to Hide Your Love Away (composed by John and supposedely refered to the band's manager Brian Epstein and his homosexuality) is closed with flutes. There is another Dylan-like John composition, It's Only Love. Both are magnificent. And I Need You, the first contribution of George to this album, features some inovative guitar effects (though they are best heard in a Beatles b-side single, Yes It Is).

But the real tricks of this album are, insterestingly, in more obscure tracks. They are: The Night Before, Tell Me What You See and I've Just Seen a Face, by Paul and You Like Me Too Much, the second George song. The Night Before, Tell Me What You See and You Like Me Too Much might be, though I can't state for sure, the pioneers in the jazz-rock experiment that would blossom late in the sixties. The Night Before, a great song (maybe my favorite from this album), features the famous Fender Rhodes electric piano that would be one of the key elements of fusion in a rocking sound that pretty much antecipates what the Miles Davis band keyboardists would do some years later. (Let's not forget that Miles was introduced to the Beatles by his drummer, Tony Williams, who highly influenced Miles to explore new sounds both as a listener and as a musician.)

You Like Me Too Much opens with a beautiful, jazzy piano line, and follows with some more use of electric piano in the main section of the song. Tell Me What You See features the electric piano in a more evident, but less imaginative fashion. Last but not least, I've Just Seen a Face is a fast country-like song, but what really makes it worth to notice is the guitar introduction that builds in a crescendo in what might be one of the most imaginative guitar works to date in a rock album - let's not forget it's early 1965.

And then, of course, you still have Help! and Ticket to Ride, the most classic tracks (along with Yesterday, of course), to enjoy. The remaining four songs, Another Girl, You're Going to Lose that Girl, Act Naturally and Dizzy Miss Lizzy (the last two being the only covers) are not at the same level of the other ten, but not enough to harm the whole experience.

In sum, the experiments both lyrical and musical make this one in fact more of a transition album than a continuity of the early sound. An often overlooked record by admires of the most daring Beatles phase, because the inovations are too subtle to make a radical change in the band's sound. Subtle, but quite significant. Pay close attention to these subtleties and you will be rewarded with the (re)discovery of a wonderful album with a great legacy.

For its contribution to the enrichment of the Beatles sound and rock and roll in general, plus its (still) thin link to the prog-rock world, Help undoubtedly deserves a 4-star rating. Don't miss the oportunity of checking out how the adventure of combining rock and roll, classical music and jazz was first insinuated.

 Beatles For Sale by BEATLES, THE album cover Studio Album, 1964
2.54 | 47 ratings

BUY
Beatles For Sale
The Beatles Proto-Prog

Review by bfmuller

3 stars After A Hard Day's Night, The Beatles gave a step back with this Beatles for Sale, returning to cover songs and limiting their own contribution to only eight tracks.

Two of these versions, nevertheless, are quite remarkable ones.The extensive use of Hammond on Mr. Moonlight and its weird solo makes it a quite original song for the time it was recorded. Rock and Roll Music, composed by Chuck Berry, is a superb interpretation, adding power, energy, speed and drama to the original recording. It is a rocker in the vein of covers of other albums such as Please Mr. Postman, Roll over Beethoven or Twist and Shout - only that it is better. MUCH better. A great display of The Beatles power and interpretation skills. Not only the incredible vocals supplied by John, but also the instruments, particularly the rocking piano played by 6 hands: John, Paul and George Martin. Can't find words enough to express my appreciation for this song.

Going back to the start, though, again The Beatles provide a great opening song, courtesy of John. No Reply alternates between calmer and harder sections, with a great chorus in the middle and a very good coda, showcasing the impressive pace in which Lennon and McCartney were maturing as composers. No Reply, by the way, is John's jealous-guy song of the album. I'm a Loser follows with a well known chorus and a faster speed. Baby's In Black is the first slow number, shared by John and Paul, and with its intriguing lyrics - its subtle reference to the love for a widow ("She thinks of him, and so she dresses in black/ And though he'll never come back, she's dressed in black") is easily overlooked by the unattentious hearer.

I'll Follow the Sun is the classic Paul ballad, in the vein of previous Till There Was You and And I Love Her, but this time with a less optmistic subject. A goodbye song with a smater image than they used to provide ("But tomorrow may rain so/ I'll follow sun"). Very good.

Eight Days a Week, perhaps the best known song in this record, is also worth mention for its fade-in start - another original experiment at the time. The song in itself follows the steps of previous Beatles' classics.

Paul provides himself some good rockers with cover medley Kansas City/ Hey-Hey-Hey-Hey! and original What You're Doing. From the start, both John and Paul composed rockers and ballads and both composers excelled on both styles. So, the common-place image of a raw-straight forward John and a soft-romantic Paul is for the most part a distorted picture. In fact, Paul was the "official" interpreter of Little Richard songs (like the aforementioned Hey-Hey-Hey-Hey! a Long Tall Sally, released in an EP), and also composing powerful songs clearly influenced by that style, while John would take the lead vocals in most of Chuck Berry's songs.

The remainder of the songs in this album are not particularly remarkable. Like the previous one, quality drops sensitively in side B. The songs already mentioned are all highlights, but Rock and Roll Music clearly stands out, although it's a cover. Don't confuse this with any statement of weakness in the original compositions, though, as John and Paul were improving fast for all to see.

Excluding the curiosities of Mr. Moonlight and Eight Days a Week, there are not many tricks in this record, still far from the experimental years and, therefore, far from prog-rock. Though a step back in terms of number of original songs, it's a step forward in terms of the quality of those original songs and overall sound. 3 stars.

 A Hard Day's Night by BEATLES, THE album cover Studio Album, 1964
3.37 | 56 ratings

BUY
A Hard Day's Night
The Beatles Proto-Prog

Review by bfmuller

2 stars A Hard Day's Night is remarkable for at least three facts: it pioneered with George's use of Rickenbacker 12-string guitar, that was so influential; it was the first Beatles album made entirely of original compositions (and the only in their whole catalogue composed exclusively of Lennon-McCartney songs, as George would later make his way as a composer himself); and it was mostly dominated by John, clearly the major force in this album, and the only example of a really imbalance between John and Paul on The Beatles catalogue. It was distinguished also because it was the first soundtrack from a Beatles movie (only side one, actually), but this is more of a curiosity than an achievement.

The album itself contains at least five classic Beatles songs: the faster ones are the title track and Can't Buy Me Love and the slower ones are If I Fell and And I Love Her (both democratically split between John and Paul). The fifth classic is caught in the middle: I Should Have Known Better, sung by John.

But then, to my ears, this one would have only another highlight in Things We Said Today, by Paul. Not that the others are absolutely let-downs. None of them are actually bad, but as the album goes, it kind of tires me, particular in side 2 (starting with track 8 on CD). Taken separately, another songs might stand out as second-class hits, like I'm Happy Just to Dance with You (sung by George, written by John), I'll Be Back and Tell Me Why (both by John). Probably the reason for that is John's lead singing (the exceptions are only 4 songs, already stated above), which accounts for diminishing one of the great appeals of Beatles albums: its diversity. Not that John's singing and writing are bad. They just don't make it for a Beatles album, which is supposed to be much more than that. That said, for my taste, this one is probably the weakest of all The Beatles albums. Not bad, but a bit tiring, and being the first phase of The Beatles the one I least appreciate, this is their album that I least listen to as well. In fact, I listened to it after several years only because of the 2009 remastered edition. Therefore, the rating here is more faithful to my actual overall opinion than the previous two, which are rounded down to suit a prog-rock website. Not this one: 2 stars is what I give it in all contexts.

 With The Beatles by BEATLES, THE album cover Studio Album, 1963
2.74 | 52 ratings

BUY
With The Beatles
The Beatles Proto-Prog

Review by bfmuller

3 stars This one is, to my taste, the best of early and more naive Beatles' records. It rock more often and harder than the previous one. This is the case of It Won't Be Long, and absolutely exciting music that catches you by the ear from the very start. Very few people won't feel the energy and vibes this song transmit.

The album follows in great fashion with the ballads All I've Got to Do and All My Loving, the first one a slower by John, the second a faster by Paul. It continues with the very first George Harrison composition, quite naive but a pretty enjoyable tune. Rumour has it that he wrote while sick in a hotel bed, that's maybe the reason of the cranky and lonely message (though in a light way, obvious). Little Child is a faster number with John's harmonica, not one of my favorites, but decent. Till There Was You is another slower ballad, with a nice hawaiian-style guitar solo.

Many more rockers follow with cover songs Please Mr. Postman (faster and harder - and better - than the better-known Carpenters version) and Chuck Berry's Roll over Beethoven, a great version sung by George. The pace is kept fast with an excellent Lennon-McCartney original, Hold Me Tight, sung by Paul, with an explicit reference to sex, long before the Stones or The Who were even composing, let alone recording. Of course it is a "light" reference ("making love to only you", says the lyrics), but still it goes to refute the idea that The Beatles were merely a naive, well-behaved band that couldn't go any further than claiming that "I Want to Hold Your Hand". (They were clever, though, and saved their more audacious songs to the records, issuing singles - the most popular vehicle for promoting music at the time - with lighter lyrics more palatable to the conservative ears and minds of early sixties Britain.)

The following is the slower soul-like You Really Got a Hold on Me, another excellent cover version sung by John. I Wanna Be Your Man, a Lennon-McCartney original sung by Ringo (and later covered by the Rolling Stones) follows. It's not a particularly good song, but has the distinction of featuring Hammond piano, I don't know if this was the first time it happened on a pop album (probably not), but still uncommon at the time.

Devil in Her Heart is a good cover song, followed by the last Lennon-McCartney original, Not a Second a Time, good tune screamed by John, and, for the sake of curiosity a typical jealous-guy theme song so particular of him. Almost every album of The Beatles would feature a John composition around the theme of jealousy. He was himself a jealous guy and admitted it latter in his solo 1971 album, Imagine, with a very well know song with that confession in the title.

The closing song doesn't work that well to me. Money was to emulate the artifice of Twist and Shout - a screaming cover song. Not quite memorable, though word has it that was quite popular in the Cavern Club times.

In sum, apart from very few weaker moments, this one does very good as an introduction and summary for The Beatles' early sound. If you were to acquire only ONE Beatles record from this early period, I would strongly recommend this one. Like we'll see later, though, I do not count Help and Rubber Soul as a part of this early sound. So you would be sparing yourself from only three records, actually.

Tough to point out highlights in such a well-balanced album, but if I was requested to do so, I would mention the first three tracks (It Won't Be Long, All I've Got to Do, All My Loving), plus Hold Me Tight and You Really Got a Hold on Me (the only cover among the highlights, what testifies for the growing maturity and sharpness of the Lennon-McCartney partnership).

A 3-star record in its own merit, only because this is a prog-rock website. In the context of rock and roll regardless of genre, or even popular music in general, this one would easily deserve 4 stars.

 Please Please Me by BEATLES, THE album cover Studio Album, 1963
2.77 | 58 ratings

BUY
Please Please Me
The Beatles Proto-Prog

Review by bfmuller

2 stars Today it isn't quite evident why The Beatles sound was so inovative and revolutionary. To fully acknowledge that, one has to look back at what was produced in the US and UK at late 50s and early 60s. By that time, rock and roll was most of the time blues-based, danceable songs, with touches of country music.

With the Beatles, it all changed. Not only in the looks or the atitude, not to mention the numbers (popularity, concerts attendance, sales, contracts). The sound changed as well.

This is not to say that the Beatles were the only band to do the kind of sound you find in this album. The characteristic early Beatles records accounted for a music know as "merseybeat" or "merseyside" (reference to the Mersey River that crosses Liverpool). It was an absolutely original and unique sound that mixed early rock and roll, rythm and blues, soul music, doo wop and skiffle. Liverpool benefited from its port status, so new sounds from across the Atlantic landed there earlier. Combined with the monopoly and strict control BBC exerted over the radio waves, Liverpool became some kind of a green house where this new sound developed quietly. It's therefore not surprising, either, that record companies were reluctant to invest in this new kind of sound. When The Beatles, rejected from Decca, signed up with EMI, the merseybeat finally reached the public ears, and rapidly fell in their taste.

The originality of merseybeat becomes even more evident when you compare The Beatles' records to the bands outside Liverpool - like the Rolling Stones - whose sound still relied strongly (and actually almost solely, in my opinion) in rythm and blues. This is to demonstrate how absolutely new this sound was, and why The Beatles were revolutionary from the very start.

Please Please Me is the sum up this early Beatles sound. Though not that appealing today, and pale in comparison to the band's ever-growing achivements in the following albums and years, it has this historical importance. This is not to say that it doesn't have its charm, as well. There are the lovely cover ballads "Anna" and "Baby It's You", both sung by John, the rockers "I Saw Her Standing There" (Paul's lead-singing) and "Please Please Me", this last one a kind of sinthesis of early merseybeat Beatles' sound. Plus, obviously, the screamed "Twist and Shout", a live favorite up until The Beatles quit touring and still a very well-known and appreciated song among both fans and occasional listeners (not quite to my taste, though, to be honest).

If only for its historical importance to rock and roll, it would certainly deserve a 4-star rating. It's not historically important to prog, though, and really not a must among non-Beatles fans. Therefore, 2 stars is a fair rating considering the context of this website.

 Help! by BEATLES, THE album cover Studio Album, 1965
3.18 | 61 ratings

BUY
Help!
The Beatles Proto-Prog

Review by halabalushindigus

5 stars You know Lennon writes his emotions then condenses them to a single emotive phrase if possible. HELP! is the perfect writing lesson here: Won't you please help me, help me, help ME All throughout the album John, George and Ringo are signing Down Songs for example JOHN 'I think i'm gonna be sad' "I can see them laugh at me" "help me if you can I'm feeling down" GEORGE "you don't realize how much I need you" "I'm lonely as can be" "cuz I could'nt really stand it I'd admit that I was wrong" RINGO "then you'll plainly see...the biggest fool that ever hit the big time" but PAUL, here we go...

The guy is totally out in left field. Happy As Can Be. And besides, I Ain't no FOOL and I don't take what I don't want for I have got.....(John says "yeah, yeah, you'll lose that girl and I'll have her by morning" or how about Paul's new vision "I've just seen a face I can't forget the time or place" 'but as it is I'll dream of her tonight la la la" BUT!!! When Paul is singing "falling, yes I am falling" he's really FALLING Hard and he does'nt know it Then Paul wakes up one day alone. The Greatest Beatle song is Selected By Lennon To Help Paul With His Immature Approach To Songwriting And there it is, "Yesterday" Paul CRASHES to earth and becomes like the rest of his bandmates, sober . Now John says Finally Some Real Emotion-- LOSS!!! hello its awesome Mr. McCartney doesn't even Have a clue as to why. " I don't know she would'nt say" excuse me mate but I just heard James Paul say "I Don't know" Lennon says that'll do just fine Of Course I grew up with the Shredded Capitol version of HELP! and it's soundtrack What a bunck of REAL IDIOTS to mess with one of the greatest setups (musically) of all-time From "Tell Me What You See" to "I've Just Seen A Face" to "Yesterday"

Heck, I thought Rubber Soul Started with "I've Just Seen A Face" Love To All yoko too

 Live At The Hollywood Bowl by DOORS, THE album cover DVD/Video, 2000
5.00 | 3 ratings

BUY
Live At The Hollywood Bowl
The Doors Proto-Prog

Review by Chard121

5 stars This video was so good it made me write my first review. The intro to "Live at the Hollywood Bowl" claims it to be the only full concert recording of The Doors. If this is true then this video is essential for anyone interested in The Doors. I was already a big Doors fan before watching this, and already thoroughly enjoyed many of the songs appearing on this dvd, but had never seen them live before. Seeing the songs live puts a whole new perspective on them. It's a much more intense trip.

Jim Morrison puts on a fantastic performance that is as poetic as it is musical. It really shows you why he was so notorious.That's the main difference between Doors songs in the studio and live. In the studio it's much more about the sound, and I believe that's what most people notice, but, live, Jim lives his lyrics so passionately in the performance that you can't help but notice how the poetry of the words meshes with the music. It's like seeing the way he interacts with the music shows you how the music is meant to be heard, always improving the effect. A good example of this is Jim dancing around the microphone like an Indian around a campfire during the intense climax of The End. This brings me to my second point: The rest of the band performs fantastically as well. They really capture the mood of the words and create some incredible suspense and explosions of energetic mind melting music using great contrasts of key and timing between instruments. The moods caught are nuts, ranging from the hellish "Horse Latitudes" to the carnival-like joy of "Light my Fire" to the spaced out majesty of "The End".

I will definitely be watching this again.

P.S. Psychedelic accompaniment encouraged. Enjoy the music the way it was meant to be enjoyed.

 Morrison Hotel by DOORS, THE album cover Studio Album, 1970
2.87 | 55 ratings

BUY
Morrison Hotel
The Doors Proto-Prog

Review by kingfriso

3 stars The Doors - Morrison Hotel (1970)

This Rating is base on PROGRELATED, not PROG

Another album it though was underrated. The Doors left some of their psychedelica behind and got more into their 'gothic' blues sound with the angelic voices of lead singer Jim Morrison. Morrision Hotel became a highly relaxing blues rock album with no weak track among it, be it some are a bit simple from the compositional point of view. Still this is blues, and blues isn't always about the noodlings and intelligent chord progressions: it's about HOW it is played. If I'd give a rating for that single element of the music, it would be a masterpiece, but since we are on a progressive/related website I'll try to be more objective.

There are to sorts of songs on this album. The typical bluesy tracks and the more evolved tracks. Typical bluestracks are Roadhouse Blues, You make me Real, Piece Frog, Queen of the Highway and Maggie McHill. I talked enough about the bluesy side of the record, so I'm going to the discuss the other tracks here.

Waiting for the Sun is one of the more progressive tracks by the Doors. It has an intelligent composition and some symphonic elements. Blue Sunday is one of my Doors favourites. This is pure devotion combined with a gentle approach on music, a quiet song, but emotionally deeply evolved. Great! Ship of Fools is darker song with a touchy, interesting middle section. The lyrics are as expected with such a title, critical to society. Spy falls between the bluess and the evolved songs. It's so atmospheric and even erotical that it's a track on it's own, your girlfriend will like this! Sing it for her! Indian Summer is a track like Blue Sunday, silent and devoted.

Conclusion. For proto-prog or related this is a great album. Doors fans should never skip on it and the critics might not been very accurate. They will tell you what this album doesn't have, but what about the things that replaces those elements? What's new about it? What's wrong with a great band playing great blues songs? Which songs can replace the pure magic of Blue Sunday, Spy and Indian Summer? Just because this isn't as great as some other Doors records, it doesn't mean it isn't an excellent addition still? Well.. I myself rate this as a highly rewarding album with a high level of relaxation abilities. Three stars! Just get it! Especially protoprogger, classic rock fans and those who have girlfriends/wives among us or want a relaxing blue sunday.

Data cached

Proto-Prog bands/artists list

Bands/Artists Country
ANDROMEDA United Kingdom
APPALOOSA United States
BAKERLOO United Kingdom
THE BEATLES United Kingdom
BRAINBOX Netherlands
THE ARTHUR BROWN BAND United Kingdom
THE COLLECTORS Canada
COVEN United States
THE CROME SYRCUS United States
DEEP PURPLE United Kingdom
THE DOORS United States
EARTH OPERA United States
FLAMING YOUTH United Kingdom
GILES GILES & FRIPP United Kingdom
THE GODS United Kingdom
H.P. LOVECRAFT United States
HANSSON & KARLSSON Sweden
HAPSHASH AND THE COLOURED COAT United Kingdom
JIMI HENDRIX United States
IRON BUTTERFLY United States
IT'S A BEAUTIFUL DAY United States
JEFFERSON AIRPLANE United States
KALEIDOSCOPE / FAIRFIELD PARLOUR United Kingdom
MÁQUINA! Spain
THE MASTERS APPRENTICES Australia
THE MOVE United Kingdom
NIRVANA United Kingdom
PAN & REGALIZ Spain
PÄRSON SOUND Sweden
QUIET WORLD United Kingdom
SALAMANDER United Kingdom
SPIRIT United States
SWEETWATER United States
TOMORROW United Kingdom
TOUCH United States
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA United States
VANILLA FUDGE United States
THE WHO United Kingdom

Proto-Prog Specialists


Ordered by join date

Copyright © Prog Archives, All rights reserved. | Legal Notice | Privacy Policy | Advertise | GeoIP Services by MaxMind