| How to submit new MP3s
Pink Floyd Live At Pompeii - Echoes (Part 2)Added by jarf9 «recogido , quizas de la mejor pelicula de rockc de la historia... FANTASTICO»
Pink Floyd - Atom Heart Mother Suite with Ron Geesin orchestra (3/3)Added by Cesar Inca «Third and last part of this historical live performance of the 'Atom Heart Mother' suite.»
Added by progwzrd «From the brief Syd Barrett-era of Pink Floyd. In all it's psychadelic beauty.»
![]() | Dark Side Of The Moon Capitol (Audio CD 1990) | $9.99 $3.51 (used) |
![]() | The Wall (Deluxe Packaging Digitally Remastered) Original recording reissued Capitol (Audio CD 2000) | $17.96 $9.92 (used) |
![]() | Wish You Were Here Original recording reissued, Original recording remastered Capitol (Audio CD 2000) | $9.21 $4.97 (used) |
![]() | Dark Side of the Moon 30th Anniversary Edition Hybrid SACD - DSD Capitol (Audio CD 2003) | $11.49 $8.94 (used) |
![]() | The Division Bell Sony (Audio CD 1994) | $7.13 $0.98 (used) |
![]() | Animals Original recording reissued, Original recording remastered Capitol (Audio CD 2000) | $6.99 $6.63 (used) |
![]() | Meddle Capitol (Audio CD 1990) | $10.36 $6.99 (used) |
![]() | Echoes: The Best of Pink Floyd Original recording remastered Capitol (Audio CD 2001) | $11.93 $5.46 (used) |
![]() | A Momentary Lapse of Reason Capitol (Audio CD 2009) | $9.96 $9.18 (used) |
![]() | Obscured by Clouds Capitol (Audio CD 1996) | $9.38 $6.95 (used) |
![]() 3.94 | 340 ratings The Piper At The Gates Of Dawn 1967 |
![]() 3.72 | 258 ratings A Saucerful Of Secrets 1968 |
![]() 3.19 | 154 ratings More 1969 |
![]() 3.50 | 245 ratings Ummagumma 1969 |
![]() 3.88 | 368 ratings Atom Heart Mother 1970 |
![]() 4.27 | 452 ratings Meddle 1971 |
![]() 3.32 | 198 ratings Obscured By Clouds 1972 |
![]() 4.55 | 856 ratings Dark Side Of The Moon 1973 |
![]() 4.62 | 808 ratings Wish You Were Here 1975 |
![]() 4.50 | 591 ratings Animals 1977 |
![]() 4.02 | 503 ratings The Wall 1979 |
![]() 3.17 | 264 ratings The Final Cut 1983 |
![]() 3.04 | 217 ratings A Momentary Lapse Of Reason 1987 |
![]() 3.80 | 296 ratings Division Bell 1994 |
![]() 3.16 | 43 ratings The Delicate Sound Of Thunder 1988 |
![]() 3.83 | 92 ratings P-U-L-S-E 1995 |
![]() 2.54 | 11 ratings Live 66-67 1999 |
![]() 4.13 | 59 ratings Is There Anybody Out There? 2000 |
![]() 1.73 | 6 ratings The Best Of The Pink Floyd 1970 |
![]() 3.59 | 78 ratings Relics 1971 |
![]() 2.89 | 16 ratings A Nice Pair 1973 |
![]() 2.45 | 7 ratings Masters Of Rock Vol. 1 1974 |
![]() 2.00 | 49 ratings A Collection Of Great Dance Songs 1981 |
![]() 2.05 | 32 ratings Works 1983 |
![]() 3.15 | 15 ratings Shine On 1992 |
![]() 3.67 | 3 ratings The Early Singles 1992 |
![]() 3.03 | 12 ratings 1967: The First Three Singles 1997 |
![]() 3.20 | 60 ratings Echoes - The Best Of Pink Floyd 2001 |
![]() 3.66 | 8 ratings Oh By The Way... 2007 |
![]() 3.00 | 2 ratings Arnold Layne 1967 |
![]() 3.00 | 3 ratings See Emily Play 1967 |
![]() 3.00 | 1 ratings Apples and Oranges 1967 |
![]() 3.00 | 1 ratings It Would Be So Nice 1967 |
![]() 2.55 | 26 ratings Tonite Let's All Make Love In London 1967 |
![]() 4.14 | 3 ratings Point Me at the Sky 1968 |
![]() 3.00 | 2 ratings The Nile Song 1969 |
![]() 5.00 | 2 ratings "One of These Days" 1971 |
![]() 5.00 | 2 ratings Money 1973 |
![]() 5.00 | 2 ratings Time 1973 |
![]() 5.00 | 2 ratings Have a Cigar 1975 |
![]() 5.00 | 2 ratings Comfortably Numb 1979 |
![]() 3.67 | 3 ratings Another Brick In The Wall 1979 |
![]() 4.33 | 3 ratings Run Like Hell 1980 |
![]() 4.00 | 2 ratings When the Tigers Broke Free 1982 |
![]() 1.70 | 7 ratings Not Now John/The Hero's Return (Part 2) 1983 |
![]() 2.24 | 7 ratings Learning To Fly (promo single) 1987 |
![]() 4.00 | 1 ratings On the Turning Away 1987 |
![]() 4.00 | 1 ratings One Slip 1988 |
![]() 3.14 | 8 ratings High Hopes/ Keep Talking (single) 1994 |
![]() 3.59 | 11 ratings Take It Back (single) 1994 |
not rated
Interview Disc 1995 |
Review by mscbox
Ummagumma is one of the albums that is special. Special, because it is a unique album, in a
style not done by others, certainly not before. It is also an album that creates a specific
atmosphere, a specialty that belongs to Pink Floyd anyway. But is the music exceptionally
good? Are there songs on this album that ask for special attention? I am afraid that my answer
is no. It is nice to listen to, but it is not the music that you often listen to. I have to say that
especially the "solostic" parts on the original second lp weaken the album to a rating of only a
3. That is a pity because the first LP is maybe not excellent but at least essential due to the
uniqueness.
As a registered member (register here if not), you can post rating/reviews (& edit later), comments reviews and submit new albums.
You are not logged, please complete authentication before continuing (use forum credentials).
Review by
Marty McFly
Collaborator Errors and Omissions Team
We have to differ good from bad guys and girls, men and women, ladies and gentlemen, prog night addicts and daytime
embracers, am I right ? When something quite good gets very good rating, we have to either adjust rating for even better album,
or fix first one to more fit to each other.This is under-estimated masterpiece. Orchestral parts forced to work together as slave labor to Pink Floyd's band members (except Nick, he gets sunshine most of the time). Of course, in this case, when counting out Mason, it's Gilmour who's most prominent, but that's standard situation here, so no raised eyebrows this time. First epic, or if you want, suite. I first heard it about six years ago, when my father was (intentionally) presenting me Pink Floyd's music. I remember two things: I didn't like it much and second one: it was ancient Roman like (these trumpets), it reminded me something like Quo Vadis, or simply these old Rome films. I've returned to this album again when I saw one certain thread about epics. Someone (thanks) said that AHM is in fact first epic. So I took this as a little push-forward and tried it.
5(-), I don't regret. It's one of these albums where you can enjoy every part of it and you're still smiling wide. So high rating because it's Pink Floyd = guarantee of quality. And so it works, it's a very good one. I've said it, I've said it.
As a registered member (register here if not), you can post rating/reviews (& edit later), comments reviews and submit new albums.
You are not logged, please complete authentication before continuing (use forum credentials).
Review by
progrules
Prog Reviewer
Pink Floyd was still right in the middle of their psychedelic era at this point and delivered quite
an interesting piece of prog here. Especially the title track has always intrigued me a lot.
Tremendous variation lasting for 23 minutes, this one is pretty challenging to say the least.
And yet there were already the first signs of a straightforward melodic Pink Floyd with this epic.
Especially in the first half of the song there are hints to their later master piece epic SoyCD.
And it's actually because of this that I manage to have the greatest respect for this epic. In fact
it scores higher for my personal taste than the more praised Echoes from the later album
Meddle. For I don't mind if a song gets complex and a little weird at times (challenging is a
better word really) as long as there is also real music to be enjoyed. And that's what Pink Floyd
did very well here. It's a great mix of all sorts of prog in all kinds of tempo and moods.And this epic alone will determine my ultimate score for the larger part. Because it's so significant and essential in prog history. I mean, this is 1970 and to produce something like this at this moment in time is really a breakthrough and a milestone in progressive rock. Same as KC's debut also here I have ultimate respect for what is achieved with this track and album.
The b-side contains a couple of short songs and a mini epic to conclude with. If is a pretty ballad and quite famous of course. Nothing psychedelic here. Summer '68 is also fairly normal and quiet with dominant piano. Fat Old Sun is third in a row in this more or less same style. This time guitars accompany the restrained vocals.
Alan's Psychedelic Breakfast is a very interesting mini epic. In fact this is one of my earlier prog experiences as I bought the vinyl in the early eighties and after more than a quarter of a century (I just bought the disc and my pick up doesn't work anymore for a long time) I still remember the typical breakfast sounds in the song. Funny that this is actually the moment I remember most of the entire song. The rest is less psychedelic than the large epic I believe but all in all not as attractive if I may say so. Still very intriguing and original.
Leaves me the task to rate this album. It's not a masterpiece for me since it's too far from perfect. But rating it with three stars would be selling it short big time. So that leaves 4 stars as only possibility mainly due to great significance for prog history and also to sheer greatness. After Animals and WywH this is my most favourite PF album.
As a registered member (register here if not), you can post rating/reviews (& edit later), comments reviews and submit new albums.
You are not logged, please complete authentication before continuing (use forum credentials).
Review by Malve87
I bought this single at a local record flea-market and paid it pratically nothing.
"Take it back" is a song from "The division bell" album released in 1994 and it's a very good
uptempo track with a superbe arrangement which features Gilmour's delayed guitars, Wright's
grandious hammond organ and female choir sections: in other words every possible Floyd trademark so
far. The song deals with human beings relationship with Nature and with the Earth, which in the end
will make us pay for every crime against environment "taking it back...someday".
The Single also contains a live version of "Astronomy domine", later on avalaible also on "Pulse"
and a mini poster depicting Pink Floyd on stage.
Ignorable the radio-edit version of the first song.Good music, not essential release (it's just a single after all).
As a registered member (register here if not), you can post rating/reviews (& edit later), comments reviews and submit new albums.
You are not logged, please complete authentication before continuing (use forum credentials).
Review by
Marty McFly
Collaborator Errors and Omissions Team
Too much bad blood here, too much envy, retribution and hate, which blindly smashes hopes. But maybe it's just "temporary", as
after this, Nick and Rick would become regular buddies on gigs (famous Thunder and Pulse). Don't know why, but I don't feel so
good listening this. Whereas "The Final Cut" became Roger's work, this seems to be David's. Like two small boys fighting each
others for pretty girl (audience). Almost, except they create quite good music. However, where Waters was at least a little bit crazy
(who knows how much), so his music wasn't so mundane (even it followed some patterns - noise/calm singing), Gilmour is more
rock. And certainly influenced by 80's, even not so much. Repertoire from this album would become standard ammunition of their
concerts, but is it worth of ? Mostly melodic, sometimes more pop, but there are experimental (not so much, but they are at least a
little bit) pieces.4(-) perhaps. Let's be fair. Even three plus would be maybe more sufficient. However, because of mentioned repeats on gigs, this is quite well known album, just another reason to give more.
As a registered member (register here if not), you can post rating/reviews (& edit later), comments reviews and submit new albums.
You are not logged, please complete authentication before continuing (use forum credentials).
Review by
Marty McFly
Collaborator Errors and Omissions Team
I'm sad that some people, even they'll never admit it, voted "against" (which means 3 stars here) Pink Floyd, just because it's
overrated album. Being it some other group, releasing just this album, they would give more. Or at least that's how I see it. I'll not
name, no no.So what to say about actual music ? That everything fits (PF's stereotype), it has original ideas (you can find them on most of PF's albums), dark lyrics (another cliché of PF), possible Waters influence (even we'll never find out exact percentage of his reign), long concept-like tracks (well, haven't you heard this one before ?) and some other factors that makes successful Pink Floyd music. I've waited, waited and was rewarded by "Shine" main theme, if we can use this term. Welcome's weirdness and interesting last 50 seconds. Yes, these "sounds" can be considered as interesting, as we're somehow released from dark satanic magic ritual music that can cause severe mental problems on more labile individuals. Let's have a cigarette, oh, I mean cigar is somehow flagship of their, even sometimes repeating itself (which annoys a little bit). Nicely transits into Wish You Were Here, I don't have to talk about this one, do I ? It's beautiful in a more ways than just one, even fails on prog side. In this case, and I'm saying it for the first time in my life, "To the hell with prog for this time". Don't quote me here (I know you will anyway). I can just recommend youtube video with changing pictures to this song, it's nice piece of work. And last track, together with first one makes solid piece. When you shut down your brain during "empty" scenes (because they're sparse - I mean beginning's wind for example), you get strong body of music that lives, very persuasively to be honest.
5(-), But I don't care about repeating of schemes. Because ideas are new, music is great and pompously big (you can feel how full the music is) and it all works perfectly, so no one gets hurt, everyone's happy, we are live happily ever after and the work is done. Interesting enough to note, wikipedia provides very detail info on whole album and Shine track (different layers, where stats what etc).
minus point because of "emptty" parts that works far worse than in case of "Echoes" song.
As a registered member (register here if not), you can post rating/reviews (& edit later), comments reviews and submit new albums.
You are not logged, please complete authentication before continuing (use forum credentials).
Review by
Marty McFly
Collaborator Errors and Omissions Team
I'll paraphrase Hugues (Sean Trane) in one point: If there is one formula that's here about Pink Floyd, then it must be giving 5-star
rating to their albums. Tracks are as following:1)ranging from psychedelic roots, typical "stoned" track, works greatly for example on Live in Pompeii, but here too, simply not as much.
2)Nice guitar work on rather "mundane" song than some weird exploration, even the sound isn't usual (disharmony in harmony I would say)
3)Football chanting with cleverly combined repeated guitar riff (you know which one) and some nice brickwork (what?). A song with phases of slow and even slower pace.
4)With Roger Waters beautiful voice (which really fits here, does not sound like squeaky floor like usual) with jazz nostalgia longing, Marty says just: Oh yeah.
5)So, what do you want to hear, it's a blues song, ain't it ? However, dog's growling isn't annoying for me (I can imagine animal lovers and sensitive, or simply people with certain standards to be annoyed) and adds something more to this otherwise "normal" song.
6)Well, here we are talking about one of the first prog epics, aren't we ? Simply wonderful, beautiful, full of imagination, harmonic (virtually everything fits in the right place and over the years, I developed sense of liking "the middle piece"). Lyrics are monster. They're mostly nonsense as far as I understand whole sense of this song (and this is not like other epics, where it's more songs altogether, joined only by clever transitions, here it really works as one big track - yes, there are parts, but all about one thing, all in similar style and you can imagine how they work together, what's their purpose). Very interesting concept and again, works perfectly In Pompeii (everything is simply better there, it's like paradise, except it's burned place). Imitating raven's (and other birds perhaps) on synths is nice piece of work from Mr. Wright.
5(-), because of some less prog songs (you know), but it doesn't matter much.
"Overhead the albatross hangs motionless upon the air"
As a registered member (register here if not), you can post rating/reviews (& edit later), comments reviews and submit new albums.
You are not logged, please complete authentication before continuing (use forum credentials).
Review by Malve87
"Obscured by clouds" from a certain point of view is like a rich man dressed in rags, or to say it
in other words: not a concept album,but a soundtrack for "La vallèe" movie, ok, interesting song
writing, perfect, raw and unconvincing production, bad.
The album contains some very very good moments like the unusual rock "The gold is in the..." which
sounds more like The Who than Pink Floyd , the touching "Wot's...uh the deal", played again during
Gilmour last world tour in 2006 and the suggestive "Stay", written by Wright.
Too bad that the production low level spoils up what could have been a much better number :"Mudmen".
Some point in common with "St. Tropez" and "Fearless" on the track "Free Four", in which Waters
sings about Floyd recurring themes: weight of success, death, loss of his father, all subjects which
later would have been developed in other ways giving birth to masterpieces as "Wish You Were Here"
and "The Wall". Very useless and boring the "ethnic" chants in the end of "Absolutely Curtains" In the end the album is average, a less complex work by Pink Floyd, than the usual, anyhow inspired, with highs and lows, suffering from the approximate production level and by being blown away by their next release: nothing less that "Dark Side Of The Moon".
Song writing : 4 stars
Production: 2 stars
Results 3 stars.
As a registered member (register here if not), you can post rating/reviews (& edit later), comments reviews and submit new albums.
You are not logged, please complete authentication before continuing (use forum credentials).
Review by Malve87
Writing a review of "Dark side of the Moon" is very hard, but easy. I'll try to explain, it's hard
because everything has already been said and it's easy, because there are so many evident signs of
grandness on this record impossible not to notice; let's point out some of them: 1) the song writing is simply Floyd at their best: the four individuals are collaborating, so there is an undeniable equilibrium that gives strenght to it.
2) The arrangements are innovatives, they own a lot to PF previous albums, especially Meddle, but however they are enriched by the live rehersal of the whole project they had done back in 1972, when they played it in front of the audience (the piece was still called "Eclipse- a piece for assorted lunatics").
3) The production level is simply STUNNING, it sounds like if it had been recorded yesterday. Apart from these considerations the song flux is perfect, everything is in the right place.
It is an incredibly solid and flawless dark work which deals with negative aspects of human life, which potentially push people to get mad : time, money, carelessness for other persons, greed, fear etc... in the proposition of these themes the work is always pervaded by a deep sense of drama and it's really theatrical.
What makes a Shakespeare's piece actual? The choice of themes which are already intrinsically eternal : a troubled love (Romeo and Juliet) jealousy (Othello) and so on; this peculiarity can be found also on "Dark side of the Moon". What probably makes this record immortal and so adored by people is also the unique atmosphere that it creates, thanks to its numerous changes of moods, right from the first heartbeat to the last notes of the majestic closing track "Eclipse"; The sound of the band is ethereal, surreal, visionary, elegant, psychedelic yet jazzy in some bits..incredible.
Timeless, a milestone in rock history and one of the most important art statement of the 20th century.
As a registered member (register here if not), you can post rating/reviews (& edit later), comments reviews and submit new albums.
You are not logged, please complete authentication before continuing (use forum credentials).
Review by
ExittheLemming
Prog Reviewer
Freshly Minted Clichés With No Sell-by Date in SightLet There Be More Light - You have to take a step back on excavating this gaudy fossil after so many years to appreciate just how resilient early Floyd DNA truly was. Water's elastic and circular bass riff which allows Wright's overlying implied organ harmonies to move neurotically around it has been borrowed by everyone and their dog ever since. Similarly that particularly Floydian take on oriental tonality and eastern inflected phrasing, has come to represent our idea in the west of what Indian classical music might actually sound like. (It doesn't but that's not the point, ethnic forgeries fetch more than the originals in this marketplace) The lulling and sensual derangement of Barrett is never far from the surface and as to what his practical contribution to the album may or may not have been, his spirit nevertheless permeates every track here.
Remember a Day - Floyd revisit the softer poppier psychedelia of Piper on a song worthy of anything of a similar hue contained on the latter. They splice together very appropriately the childlike and the sinister elements that coexisted so effortlessly in Syd's oeuvre.
Why can't we stay that way ?, climb your favourite apple tree Try to catch the sun,hide from your little brother's gun Dream Yourself away, why can't we reach the sun ? why can't we blow the years away ?
A song so dreamily trippy that every copy of Saucerful should have shipped with a complimentary set of finger cymbals.
Set the Controls for the Heart of the Sun - Notwithstanding the hedonistic spacey abandon that this track celebrates, there is a nihilistic darkness at the heart of the Floyd critter as evidenced by the title and a somewhat ambiguous lyric:
Who is the man who arrives at the wall ? making the shape of his questions at asking Thinking the sun will fall in the evening, will he remember the lesson of giving ?
Waters clearly believes that the eternal cycle of sun nourished life would be much better off without the meddlesome questioning of any kind of sentient middleman.
Had Apocalypse Now had a European director and been set in the failing British Empire of India, you have in your paws a much better soundtrack than the otherwise excellent one provided by the Doors.(and arguably more consistent with the spirit of Joseph Conrad's novel on which Coppola's movie is based)
Corporal Clegg - The best song John Lennon didn't write. Surface amusing but thick with irony and a snarling critique of the exploitation of war heroes who lay their lives and mental health on the line for a patriotic idealism not shared by their lords and masters. Almost a sister song companion to I Am the Walrus:
He's never been the same, no-one is to blame Mrs Clegg you must be proud of him, Mrs Clegg another drop of gin ?
Like so many innovative facets of this album, it is all too easy to forget that caustically bitter triumphant fanfares had their painful birth throes here. Ditto for the cackling distortion applied to the vocal to imbue same with an unnerving menace. If you wish some sort of litmus test for true originality, you might be well served to start with artists like these, who invented clichés.
A Saucerful of Secrets - Pink Floyd at their least cuddly i.e. a glacially drawn out and heavily padded exercise in how to fill space with yet more space. Perhaps even more tiresome than Interstellar Overdrive as this is shorn of even the mitigating uber riff of the former. Perfect opportunity to get some finger cymbal practice in though. Things do perk up significantly after 4 minutes (or has it been days ?) with a rippling tom groove from Mason over which the BBC Radiophonic Workshop get to earn royalties for their vast but hitherto untapped library of Weird Random Shit Volumes 1 through 57. The emptiness is now full to overflowing. Circa nine minutes you will be rewarded for your industrial strength patience with a deliciously ethereal organ chord sequence that simply blows the likes of the heavily saturated 'Margarine' Dream out of the flotation tank.
See Saw - Mercifully, a welcome return to economy and melodic intent albeit on a rather convoluted 'Syd by Numbers' appropriation which proves if nothing else that Barrett's apparently whimsical creations had an unforgiving internal logic that his imitator's and wannabes sorely lack. It might just be me but I always detect a whiff of incest on this cryptic tale of a brother and sister ?
Another time another day she'll be selling plastic flowers on a Sunday afternoon Picking up weeds she hasn't got the time to care all can see he's not there She grows up for another man and he's down.
Jugband Blues - Heart rending that it had come to this. A very fine and memorable song but one I find hard to listen to without being saddened by the demise it precipitated in its author. Perhaps this represents Syd's first disoriented steps beyond the cusp of 'wholeness' on a composition that you could be forgiven for thinking is the product of a bicameral mind. It's doubtful if Syd would even have remembered writing, performing or recording this number.
And I'm wondering who could be writing this song I don't care if the sun don't shine and I don't care if nothing is mine and I don't care if I'm nervous with you I'll do my loving in the winter and the sea isn't green and I love the queen and what exactly is a dream ? and what exactly is a joke ?
Despite the inexorable advance of Syd's deteriorating mental condition, he continued to be able to produce work that carries the indelible mark of true greatness on two solo albums before the muse, without turning its back, left silently and forever leaving the piper alone at the gates of delirium.
From this point onwards, Floyd's output was of very little interest to me. I don't consider what followed any less accomplished than the first two albums but for this rodent, Pink Floyd were a brilliant pop group with a song-writing genius on board. Once the latter had disembarked that vessel at the behest of a mutinous crew, they became just an incredibly talented and innovative rock band. Greedy ? Not me.
As a registered member (register here if not), you can post rating/reviews (& edit later), comments reviews and submit new albums.
You are not logged, please complete authentication before continuing (use forum credentials).
Copyright © Prog Archives, All rights reserved. | Legal Notice | Privacy Policy | Advertise
| GeoIP Services by MaxMind